IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, JJ.
Vimal Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India And Another - Respondents
WRIT TAX NO.1296 OF 2023.
Decided On : 08-11-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation order under gst act (Para 2 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. preliminary objections by respondent (Para 3 , 4 , 14) |
| 3. petitioner’s registration cancellation findings. (Para 7) |
| 4. defective notice and denial of opportunity (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. petitioner's right to respond to order (Para 15) |
| 6. writ petition disposed without costs (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Sri. Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the Union.
2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 3.5.2022 passed by the Superintendent, Sector-1, Range-4, CGST Commissionerate, Gautam Budh Nagar. By that order the respondent no.2 has cancelled the petitioner's registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act').
3. At the outset, Sri. Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the present writ petition. He would submit that petitioner has statutory alternative remedy of appeal.
4. However, in view of the facts obtaining in the present case, we are not inclined to sustain the objection thus raised. Then objection has been raised as to laches. We may deal with the same a little later. The matter has been heard and we proceed to dispose of the writ petition at this stage, in view of no dispute as to the conduct of proceedings.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the records, it remains undisputed that originally the petitioner was granted registration under the Act with respect to the place of business disclosed in that registration. At the same time, on 4.8.2022 the petitioner was issued a show-cause notice seeking to cancel petitioner's registration. It reads as below:-
"Form GST REG-17/31
[See Rule 22(1)/ sub-rule (24) of rule 214]
Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Registration
|
| Signature Not Verified |
| Place: Uttar Pradesh | Digitally signed by DS Goods And |
| Date: 04/08/2022 | Services Tax Network (4) |
|
| Date:2022.08.04_13:30:19IST" |
7. Also by means of the said show-cause notice petitioner's registration was suspended. Perusal of the notice further reveals that the date fixed for the proceedings was 5.8.2022 i.e. the date following the date of issuance of notice.
8. A reply thereto appears to have been received on record on 17.4.2022. However, learned counsel for the petitioner would contend no such reply came to be furnished. It is the further case of the petitioner, no proceeding was conducted over a long period of nine months. Yet, without any further notice, on 3.5.2023 the impugned order was passed and the petitioner's registration cancelled retrospectively. Perusal of the order revels that the petitioner's registration was cancelled for reason of non existence of the principal place of business. For ready reference the contents of the order dated 3.5.2023 are quoted below:-
"Form GST REG-19
[See Rul
The court found significant procedural lapses in the cancellation of GST registration, requiring authorities to provide a specific show-cause notice and an opportunity for the petitioner to respond, ....
A cancellation order under tax law requires clear factual allegations to comply with principles of natural justice; vague notices cannot sustain adverse conclusions against the entity.
Orders lacking reasoning do not meet constitutional scrutiny under Article 14, allowing for judicial review and the right to respond to show cause notices.
An order cancelling a registration under statutory provisions must be a speaking order, assigning specific reasons for the decision. The failure of an assessee to respond to a show cause notice does ....
Cancellation of GST registration must follow due process, including a clear show-cause notice and a reasoned order, to uphold the principles of natural justice.
Taxation - Business of providing goods - Absence of indication of grounds on which registration of petitioner was liable to be cancelled or alleged breaches committed by petitioner which was likely t....
The importance of providing detailed reasons for cancellation of registration and the need for compliance with the principles of natural justice.
A cancellation order lacking reasoning and proper application of mind violates procedural fairness and natural justice principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.