IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
AKIL KURESHI, S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY, JJ.
OPC Assets Solutions Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tripura, represented by the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Tripura, Civil Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 401 of 2021
Decided On : 31-08-2021
Constitution of India – Writ Petition - Tripura Goods and Services Tax Act - Central Goods and Services Tax Act - The petitioner was granted registration under CGST as well as State GST Acts - According to the petitioner whenever demand for any capital goods or machinery is received by the petitioner, the petitioner enters into a rental agreement with the customer and in terms and conditions thereof the petitioner would rent goods to the customer - calling upon the petitioner to state why the registration should not be cancelled.
Finding of the Court: The ground on which such registration was liable to be cancelled according to the Superintendent was “non-compliance of any specified provisions in GST Act or the Rules made thereunder as may be prescribed - The age of internet and availability of information through technology, the Superintendent of Taxes was not precluded from doing his own homework and finding out material which was useful for the purpose of the case that he was deciding - any use of such material must precede sharing of it with the person likely to be adversely affected by his order. The basic requirement of principle of natural justice for sharing adverse material before utilising the same against a person must be observed with greater rigour in the times of availability of information on internet, all of which need not necessarily be accurate at all times. Accurate or otherwise the notice must have a chance to meet with such adverse material before it is used against him.
Result: Petition allowed and disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Akil Kureshi, J.
The petitioner has challenged an order dated 23.04.2021 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Charge-IV, Tripura cancelling the petitioner’s registration under Tripura Goods and Services Tax Act as well as Central Goods and Services Tax Act.
2. Brief facts are as under:
The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of providing goods on rental basis to its customers across the country including in the State of Tripura. In the State of Tripura the petitioner commenced its business in the year 2013-14. The petitioner was granted registration under CGST as well as State GST Acts. According to the petitioner whenever demand for any capital goods or machinery is received by the petitioner, the petitioner enters into a rental agreement with the customer and in terms and conditions thereof the petitioner would rent goods to the customer. The petitioner had purchased goods from M/S Reliance Retail Limited, Tripura (RRL, for short) for renting it back to RRL. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had obtained premises from one Rinku Dey on lease for its business purpose and for registration. Such lease was renewed from time to time. However, subsequently the petitioner was required to take new premises on lease. On 06.09.2020 the petitioner received a notice from the State GST Department. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had satisfied the queries raised in such communication under its letter dated 16.01.2021.
3. On 06.12.2020 the petitioner received a show-cause notice from the Superintendent of Taxes why the petitioner’s registration should not be cancelled. This notice reads as under :
1 Non-compliance of any specified provisions in the GST Act or the Rules made thereunder as may be prescribed.
You are hereby directed to furnish a reply to the notice within seven working days from the date of service of this notice.
You are hereby directed to appear before the undersigned on 15/12/2020 at 11:25.
If you fail to furnish a reply within the stipulated date or fail to appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time, the case will be decided ex parte on the basis of available records and on merits.
Please note that your registration stands suspended with effect from 06/12/2020.” (emphasis supplied by us)
4. The petitioner replied to the said show-cause notice dated 06.12.2020 under a letter dated 16.01.2021 and stated as under:
The above named Taxpayer acknowledges the receipt of SCN dated 06/12/2020 for cancellation of registration on the matter of non compliance of any specified provision in GST.
That it is pertinent to mention herein that the taxpayer is regular in paying their taxes and regular in filing their returns on time.
That it can be understood that matter of non-compliance is in connection with SCN u/s 61 of GST Act dated 06.09.2020 in the matter of clarification of excess ITC claimed as appeared in the differences in the GSTR3B and GSTR2A for the period Apr-2018 to Mar-19.
That, the matter relating to the same is being handled by Shri Nanda Dulal Pal, Advocate, Shri Nirnoy Paul, Advocate and Mr. Ninnaz Paul and a written submission in connection with the same along with additional supporting documents has been submitted today vide ASMT 11 bearing ARN No.ZD1601210003021 dated 16.01.2021.
That, the taxpayer assures full co-operation with the department and its procedures and that a written Compliance in Ref to SCN dated 06.09.2020 has been submitted and thus hereby pray before you to kindly revoke the SCN for cancellation of registration and allow taxpayer to run its course of business smoothly and file their returns on time and deposit applicable taxes and hope that your honour would be pleased to allow the same and drop the proceedings form your end otherwise the taxpayer wo
Taxation - Business of providing goods - Absence of indication of grounds on which registration of petitioner was liable to be cancelled or alleged breaches committed by petitioner which was likely t....
An adjudicating authority exercising statutory power to cancel tax registration must record clear reasons for its decision. As a matter of natural justice and fair procedure, an order devoid of reaso....
An order cancelling a registration under statutory provisions must be a speaking order, assigning specific reasons for the decision. The failure of an assessee to respond to a show cause notice does ....
An adjudicating authority is mandatorily obligated to issue a reasoned, speaking order when cancelling a registration, regardless of whether a response was filed. Failure to provide specific reasons ....
Cancellation of GST registration must follow due process, including a clear show-cause notice and a reasoned order, to uphold the principles of natural justice.
The cancellation of registration must satisfy the requirements of Section 29 of the CGST Act. The show-cause notice for cancellation must contain specific allegations and proposed evidence. The order....
GST registration cancellation quashed as arbitrary for ignoring proprietor's ill-health causing temporary business halt, issuing vague unreasoned show-cause notices, and passing mechanical orders wit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.