SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2583

SAURABH LAVANIA
Ajeet Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohd Shadab Khan
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. notice dispensed and petition disposed. (Para 2 , 9)
2. expeditious disposal of pending mutation cases under u.p. revenue code. (Para 3 , 4)
3. state counsel supports expedited order. (Para 5)
4. court directs quick resolution with hearing rights. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Heard.

2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.

3. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case No.5451 of 2022, Computerized Case No. T-202204230105451 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2.

4. It is stated that as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the mutation proceedings, being summary in nature, ought to have been decided within 45 days if there is no dispute and if there is dispute, then the same should preferably be decided within 90 days. However, in the instant case, the proceedings for mutation are pending since 22.06.2022. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case.

5. L

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top