IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Ghanshyam Verma - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and 3 ors. - Respondents
WRIT A NO. 22952 OF 2014.
Decided On : 07-03-2024
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
In the present case, there are allegations against petitioner (Ghanshyam Verma) that on his place his cousin Roop Narayan Verma has joined at concerned school on post of Assistant Teacher pasting his photo though educational documents were of petitioner. He was appointed in 1999 and got salary up to June 2002.
2. During inquiry, it was held that it was a forged appointment and by impugned order, appointment of petitioner was declared void-ab-initio.
3. During inquiry, it was further found that Roop Narayan Verma has opened a bank account in name of petitioner, by posting his photograph on application form, service book and bank opening form though all documents were in name of petitioner i.e. Ghanshyam Verma. It was also found that petitioner (Ghanshyam Verma) was working in Bharatpur (Rajasthan). Relevant documents were found missing. Relevant part of impugned order (passed in pursuance of order dated 12.09.2012 by this Court in Writ Petition filed by petitioner being No. 62613/2007) is quoted below:-
4. Sri. B.S. Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that -:
5. Per contra, Sri. Awadhesh Kumar, learned counsel for respondent-3 has submitted that this Court has passed following order on 05.02.2020 which is as follows -:
6. Learned counsel has further referred a supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of respondent-3 and has placed reliance on following paragraphs thereof -:
Fraudulent appointments based on forged documents create no equity for the appointee, allowing for cancellation by the employer.
Fraudulent appointments in public service are void ab initio, and individuals cannot claim rights or benefits from such appointments.
An appointment secured through fraudulent documents is void ab initio, and no formal inquiry is required for cancellation; fraud vitiates all actions taken under such circumstances.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the void ab-initio nature of the appointment based on forged and fabricated documents, leading to the termination of the petitioner's services.
An appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is void ab initio, and procedural safeguards do not apply in such cases.
An employee cannot be held guilty of fraud or forgery without clear evidence of intentional misrepresentation, especially when documentation discrepancies arise from administrative errors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.