Back
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Chandra Bali – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the factual background. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments and claims by both parties. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's review of evidence and findings. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. legal standard for issuing a writ of certiorari. (Para 10) |
| 5. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
Facts of present case in brief are that -:
2. Sri Vishnu Singh, learned counsel for petitioner has referred relevant findings returned by the Appellate Authority
Petitioners' failure to timely assert their land rights bars their claim under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
Reliance solely on historical land ownership entries without supporting evidence from parties can lead to erroneous conclusions, requiring a reevaluation of claims based on tangible evidence.
A claim of adverse possession must demonstrate clear, hostile, and continuous possession for over 12 years, supported by genuine records; incorrect or surreptitious entries do not confer any rights.
Court upheld findings of lower authorities stating that the inability to prove family partition and validity of respondents' title under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act prevailed, e....
The court reaffirmed that mere revenue entries do not suffice to establish adverse possession, which requires demonstrable continuity, publicity, and intent to possess as owner, thus justifying the i....
Adverse possession requires continuous, open, and hostile possession, which must be proven with adequate evidence beyond mere irrigation slips.
The court upheld that concurrent findings by lower authorities on land ownership are not to be disturbed unless proven perverse, emphasizing the need for solid evidence in claims over ancestral versu....
The Revisional Authority must provide sound reasoning when reversing lower court findings; mere admissions without corroborating evidence are insufficient to establish claims of ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
