Back
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Ram Garib – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. Azamgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on authority's errors. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. contextual references to law and precedence supporting claims (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondent's argument against petitioner's claims. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. discussion on the legitimacy of evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. court's observations of authority's reasoning. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. reviews on the authority's findings and evidence scrutiny (Para 25 , 29 , 31) |
| 8. revisional authority's findings upheld. (Para 30 , 32) |
| 9. principle of rebuttable presumption in property claims. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 10. writ petition dismissed. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 11. final verdict summarized and implications noted (Para 37) |
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
This writ petition is arising out of a proceeding initiated under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1953").
2. The dispute relates to Khata No. 2 consisting of 16 plots, area 3.447 acres and Khata No. 20 consisting of plot no. 724/3, area 295 Kadi, situate in Village Nebuwadeeh, Tehsil Burhanpur, District Azamgarh.
3. During
The Revisional Authority must provide sound reasoning when reversing lower court findings; mere admissions without corroborating evidence are insufficient to establish claims of ownership.
The court reaffirmed that mere revenue entries do not suffice to establish adverse possession, which requires demonstrable continuity, publicity, and intent to possess as owner, thus justifying the i....
A recorded tenant's consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire Bhumidhari rights; absence of such consent invalidates claims to ownership.
The court ruled that title objections under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act must be decided on merit, emphasizing the need for proper jurisdiction and evidence rather than relying on alleged c....
Petitioners' failure to timely assert their land rights bars their claim under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
Reliance solely on historical land ownership entries without supporting evidence from parties can lead to erroneous conclusions, requiring a reevaluation of claims based on tangible evidence.
A recorded tenant's written consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire privileges under the United Provinces Agricultural Tenants Act.
The presumption of truth attached to revenue records can only be rebutted by evidence of impeccable integrity, and procedural fairness must be upheld in appeals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
