SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2720

SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Ravikesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Suyash Pandey Advocate.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for pond lease. (Para 2 , 3)
2. procedural grievances regarding cancellation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. opposition from the state on lease cancellation. (Para 6 , 7 , 10)
4. analysis of petitioner's standing and rights. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
5. court's decision against petitioner's entitlement. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. dismissal of writ petition and refund order. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Srivastava, J.

Heard Sri Suyash Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 4.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:

    "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.6.2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure no. 6 to the writ petition);

    ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Martinganj, District Azamgarh to execute lease deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the pond situated in plot no. 44 having 0.380 hectare situated in Gram Panchayat, Mahibullaganj, Tehsil Martinganj District Azamgarh, within the period to be stipulated by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top