SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1770

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
M/S Hari Om General Store Proprietor Ghan Shyam Kesari - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and 2 Others - Respondent
WRIT TAX NO. 1403 OF 2023.
Decided On : 07-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Devendra Pratap Singh, Rishi Tandon
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

A quasi-judicial order must provide reasons to comply with constitutional mandates, and failure to do so renders the order invalid.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19 - Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 107 - Writ petition challenging cancellation of registration - The order for cancellation was found to lack application of mind, violating principles of natural justice and the requirement for reasoned decisions in quasi-judicial orders. (Paras 2, 6, 8)

(B) Judicial Reasoning - The necessity of providing reasons in administrative and quasi-judicial orders is emphasized, as it is fundamental to ensuring fairness and compliance with constitutional mandates. (Paras 7, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of GST registration, arguing that the order lacked coherence and reasoning, thus infringing on their right to conduct business.

Findings of Court:
The court found the cancellation order devoid of reasoning, violating Article 14, and set it aside, allowing the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice.

Issues: The main issues included whether the cancellation order was made with proper reasoning and the implications of the appellate authority's decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a quasi-judicial order must include reasons to comply with Article 14, and the absence of such reasoning renders the order invalid.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT

Shekhar B. Saraf, J.

Heard Sri. Rishi Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated June 10, 2022 and the order dated July 27, 2023 passed in appeal under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the order for cancellation of registration has been passed without any application of mind whatsoever and the same is clear from the very first two lines of the order dated June 10, 2022. The relevant part of the said order is quoted below:

    "This has reference to your reply dated 08/06/2022 in response to the notice to show cause dated 30/5/2022 Whereas no reply to notice to show cause has been submitted"

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the first line, the order states that a reply was filed by the petitioner on June 8, 2022 whereas the second line contradicts the above statement saying that no reply was filed by the petitioner. He relies upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.172 of 2023 titled as Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and others decided on August 23, 2023, wherein the Division Bench has held as follows:"

    6. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that although no fault can be found with the appellate order dismissing the appeal as Appellate Authority does not have the power to condone the delay in terms of the scheme of the Act, however, he argues that the order cancelling the registration is without application of mind; he draws my attention to the impugned order dated 07.01.2023, which does not disclose any application of mind. He, thus, argues that the quasi judicial order which has an adverse effect on the right of the petitioner to run business as guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution of India, the same has been done without any application of mind which is neither the intent of the Act nor can it be held to be in compliance of the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He further argues that as the appeal has not been decided on merit, the doctrine of merger will have no application and it is only the order dated 07.01.2023 which affects the petitioner and as the same is devoid of any reasons, the same can be challenged before this Court as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and Ors. - (1998) 8 SCC 1.

    7. He further places reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Om Prakash Mishra v. State of U.P. & Ors.; Writ Tax No.100 of 2022 decided on 06.09.2022 wherein this Court had recorded that every administrative authority or a quasi judicial authority should necessarily indicate reasons as reasons are heart and soul of any judicial or administrative order.

    8. In the present case from the perusal of the order dated 07.01.2023, clearly there is no reason ascribed to take such a harsh action of cancellation of registration. In view of the order being without any application of mind, the same does not satisfy the test of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as such, the impugned order dated 07.01.2023 (Annexure - 2) is set aside. The petition is accordingly allowed.

    9. It is, however, directed that the petitioner shall file reply to the show-cause notice within a period of three weeks from today. The Adjudicating Authority i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Gonda shall proceed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after considering whatever defence he may take."

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.1476 of 2022 titled as M/s Namo Narayan Si

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top