IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR, JJ.
M/s Makewell Pharma Gomti Nagar Lucknow - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Another - Respondents
WRIT TAX NO. - 207 OF 2023.
Decided On : 16-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed against registration cancellation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against cancellation order's lack of reasoning. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. impugned order lacks application of mind. (Para 7) |
| 4. petition allowed; order set aside. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent, Sector- 20, Lucknow i.e. respondent no. 3, whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a proprietorship concern engaged in civil contractual works and was registered under the GST Act. It appears that as the GST returns was not filed by the counsel, a show-cause notice dated 09.11.2022 was served. In the said show-cause notice, the reasons as prescribed were as under:
4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner did not have knowledge of the show-cause notice on account of COVID-19 upsurge, thus, the reply could not be filed and an order came to be passed on 23.12.2022 (Annexure - 3) whereby registration was cancelled. The gist of the cancellation order is reproduced herein below:
| "Reference Number:ZA091222184601P | Dated: 23.12.2022 |
Dated: 23.12.2022
| Application Reference No. (ARN): AA091122038401R | Dated: 08/11/2022 |
| Head | Central Tax | State Tax/UT Tax | Integrated Tax | Cess |
| Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penalty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Vikas Kapoor
Superintendent
Lucknow Sector-20"
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that although no fault can be found with the appellate order dismissing the appeal as Appellate Authority does not have the power to condone the delay in terms of the scheme of the Act, however, he argues that the order cancelling the registration is without application of mind; he draws my attention to the impugned order dated 23.12.2022, which does not disclose any applicati
Quasi-judicial orders must include reasoning; lack of justification for cancellation of registration violates principles of natural justice and the Constitution.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal standards.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with Article 14 of the Constitution, ensuring fairness and the right to a hearing.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with constitutional mandates, ensuring fairness and application of mind in decision-making.
A quasi-judicial order must provide reasons to comply with constitutional mandates, and failure to do so renders the order invalid.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to comply with principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution.
Quasi-judicial orders must provide reasons to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice and legality, as mandated by Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.
The cancellation of registration under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act was quashed due to lack of reasoning, violating principles of natural justice and constitutional rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.