SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2303

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, MANISH KUMAR
Makewell Pharma Gomti Nagar Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anurag Mishra.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent, Sector- 20, Lucknow i.e. respondent no. 3, whereby the registration of the petitioner was cancelled.

3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a proprietorship concern engaged in civil contractual works and was registered under the GST Act. It appears that as the GST returns was not filed by the counsel, a show-cause notice dated 09.11.2022 was served. In the said show-cause notice, the reasons as prescribed were as under:

    "Whereas on the basis of information which has come to my notice, it appears that your registration is liable to be cancelled for the following reasons:

    1. returns furnished by you under Section 39 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

    Observations

    Failure to furnish returns for a continuous period of six months

    You are hereby directed to furnish a reply to the notice within thirty days from the date of service of this notice.

    You are hereby directed to appear before the undersigned on 08/12/2022 at 11:00

    If you fail to furnish a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top