Rani Vaishay vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2752

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2752

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Rani Vaishay – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Sandeep Mishra
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Adarsh Kumar Pandey

Table of Content
1. application to quash proceedings based on compromise. (Para 2)
2. parties settled and oppose continuing the trial. (Para 3 , 5)
3. court can quash non-compoundable offences if in the interest of justice. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal precedents support quashing based on settlement. (Para 9)
5. quashing of fir and final order. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

Heard Mr. Sandeep Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Adarsh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Session Trial No.603 of 2019 under Sections 323 , 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) (D),3(1)(Dh) SC/ST Act arising out of Case Crime No.179 of 2019, Police Station Jagdishpura District Agra on the basis of compromise.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the parties have entered into compromise and in compliance of order dated 08.07.2022, the parties have filed compromise application before the court below, which was verified by the court below vide order dated 25.08.2022. He has further submitted that since parties have settled the dispute, op