SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2684

SIDDHARTH
Bushra Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Irshad Husain,Aushim Luthra.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. application for quashing proceedings. (Para 1)
2. claim of false allegations and lack of cause. (Para 2 , 3)
3. consideration of rival submissions. (Para 4)
4. court's discretion in pre-trial matters. (Para 5 , 6)
5. encouragement of amicable settlement. (Para 7)
6. direction for accused to apply for compounding. (Para 8)
7. court's liberty to proceed post-application. (Para 9)
8. no coercive action during specified period. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
9. application disposed with observations. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

Siddharth, J.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 16.09.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 910 of 2022 (Vijay Oberao v. Bushra Khan), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station- Sadar Bazar, District- Meerut pending before Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 5, Meerut. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the entire allegations are false. Cheque in question was not issued against any existing debt or liability. Referring to the entire evide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top