SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2688

VIVEK VARMA
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Utkarsh Khanna
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Varma, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed by the counsel for the applicant, is taken on record.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the orders dated 01.11.2022 and 25.05.2022 passed by Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No. 3531 of 2022 (Menika Rani v. Rakesh Kumar), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Ghaziabad.

3. In brief, the opposite party no.2 filed a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the applicant in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)/Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad with the allegation that Cheque No.039007 issued by the applicant drawn on the Bank of India for an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- in favour of the opposite party no.2 was presented for encashment at Bank of India, Branch Navyug Market, Ghaziabad but it was returned with the remark "account closed" vide memo dated 22.04.2022. On 26.04.2022 a legal notice was sent to the applicant. Despite service of notice, the applicant did not make any payment.

4. The complai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top