Back
SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Bhanu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava, J.-Heard Sri Subhanshu holding brief of Sri Nikhil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Prakhar Tandon, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Sri Prakhar Tandon, learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent does not propose to file the counter-affidavit and the matter may be heard. Accordingly, this Court proceeds with the hearing of the case.
3. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 9.6.2016 passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer/Additional District Magistrate (III), Kanpur Nagar in case No. 7 of 2015 (Dilip Kumar v. Bhanu) whereby he has declared vacancy in respect to house No. 107/218, Nehru Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, consisting of one room, kitchen, common lavatory, common hall, bathroom on the first floor and one room/godown on the ground floor of the said house (hereinafter referred to as 'suit property') in the possession of the petitioner, order dated 26.8.2016 by which the Rent Control and Eviction Officer/Additional District Magistrate (III), Kanpur Nagar has released the suit property, and the order dated 19.10.2022 passed by the Additional District J
The court held that the Rent Control and Eviction Officer lacked jurisdiction to declare the property vacant as no landlord-tenant relationship existed between the parties.
The judgment establishes the principle that in statutory proceedings, the Authorities can incidentally go into the question of title to determine the proceedings before them, but the question of titl....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 12 of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, which deals with the declaration of vacancy of a tenement. The judgment emphasizes th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the evidentiary value of admissions made in pleadings and the principle of approbate and reprobate.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the finality of orders under the Landlord-Tenant Act and the lack of merit in impleading the petitioner in the proceedings.
A co-owner can independently file for eviction under rent control laws, and the landlord's bona fide need for property use outweighs tenant hardship claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
