Back
ALOK MATHUR
Satya Narayan – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Alok Mathur, J.
Heard Sri. Surya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri. Hari Prasad Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has assailed the validity of order dated 08.09.2023, passed by Additional District Judge, Sultanpur in Rent Appeal No. 2 of 2019, directing the petitioner to vacate the property situated at House No. 1119 (Second Floor), Ward No. 9 (Old No. 317), Nagar Panchayat Musafir Khana, District - Amethi and handing over vacant possession of the same to the respondent.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent has filed a suit for eviction under Section 21(1)A of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, against the petitioner with regard to aforesaid property. In his application it was stated that respondents were tenants of his late father Bhawani Prasad and on previous occasion also suit for eviction being Suit No. 371 of 1982 was filed before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Musafir Khana, Amethi, and was dismissed in default on 01/03/1995. An application for recall was filed for setting aside the order dismissing the case for want of prosecu
A co-owner can independently file for eviction under rent control laws, and the landlord's bona fide need for property use outweighs tenant hardship claims.
The landlord's bona fide requirement for eviction is established even if he owns other properties, and the tenant cannot dictate the landlord's use of his properties.
Tenancy and Land laws - Eviction - There is nothing that petitioners have been able to bring forth to indicate that finding has been arrived at by a misreading of facts or omitting relevant evidence ....
The plea of availability of alternative accommodation must be supported by material, and it is not for the tenant to dictate to the landlord how to accommodate himself.
The judgment establishes the importance of proving landlord-tenant relationship, genuine need, and lack of alternate suitable accommodations in eviction cases under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Eviction petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act can be maintainable even for partial tenancies, provided the landlord establishes genuine need, which courts prioritize over tenant claims of alter....
The court held that the Rent Control and Eviction Officer lacked jurisdiction to declare the property vacant as no landlord-tenant relationship existed between the parties.
A tenant cannot dispute the title of the landlord, and genuine need for premises must be established without alternative accommodation for eviction to be warranted. Adverse possession claims require ....
The eviction was upheld on grounds of bona fide requirement and established landlord-tenant relationship, negating the appellant's claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the co-owner's consent is not required for filing an eviction petition, and the tenant's objections regarding suitable alternative accommodati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
