SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2100

ABDUL MOIN
Mahendra Singh Kanwal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajendra Singh Kushwaha.
For the Respondents: C.S.C. and Rajeeva Kumar Sinha.

JUDGMENT :

(Abdul Moin, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Rajeeva Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

2. Learned counsels for the parties contend that the issue involved in all the four writ petitions are same. As such, the Court proceeds to hear all the writ petitions together and they are being decided by way of a common judgement. For convenience, facts of WRIT - A No. 11509 of 2024 are being taken.

3. Under challenge is the order dated 20.9.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the claim of the petitioner for gratuity on the basis of entire length of service rendered as Daily Wager has been rejected.

4. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1984 as a Daily Wager and has been regularized vide order dated 1.2.2014 and retired on 29.9.2019. Contention is that although the respondents have paid the gratuity to the petitioner but it is only the period of his regular service which has been counted by the respondents for payment of gratuity while the period of his services rendered as daily wager whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top