Back
VIKAS BUDHWAR
Meena Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar, J.-Heard Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri P.K. Shahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 1, Sri V.K. Singh, learnd Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ashutosh Mishra for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 and Sri Rahul Agarwal for Respondent No. 3.
2. Since affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and they do not propose to file any further affidavits, thus with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage.
3. The case of the writ petitioner as worded in the writ petition is that the second respondent, Gautam Budh University, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar is a University established under the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gautam Budh University Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-University), in exercise of the powers purported to be under Section 24 of the U.P. Act No. 9 of 2002, the Gautam Budh University has enacted the statute by the name of Uttar Pradesh Gautam Budh University First Statute, 2007.
4. The respondent-University in order to fi
The failure to issue a disagreement note when the disciplinary authority disagrees with the Enquiry Officer's findings constitutes a violation of natural justice, necessitating remittance for proper ....
The court ruled that termination based on unsupported accusations, along with procedural unfairness and malice, constitutes a violation of the employee's rights, emphasizing the necessity for fair di....
Dismissal of an employee without a fair inquiry violates natural justice principles and statutory provisions, making the writ petition maintainable despite alternative remedies.
Disciplinary proceedings require clear communication of specific charges and independent consideration of a respondent's objections to uphold principles of natural justice.
The court established that in departmental inquiries, adherence to principles of natural justice is paramount, and failure to provide a fair opportunity to defend oneself can render the inquiry and s....
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide substantiated reasoning in their decisions to ensure fairness in civil rights matters.
Quasi-judicial authorities must provide reasoned decisions when determining civil rights; failure to do so renders the decision unsustainable.
The Vice Chancellor's jurisdiction was limited to ensuring no gross illegality or injustice was committed by the Management, and the refusal to grant approval was only justified in cases of patent ar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
