SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
J.M.P. Khanna - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.37040 of 2023, Criminal misc. Bail application No. - 37510 of 2023, Criminal misc. Bail application No. - 39567 of 2023
Decided on : 19-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Somya Chaturvedi, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: G.A., Sanjay Kumar Yadav

Prolonged pre-trial detention without a solid evidentiary basis may justify bail, balancing defendants' rights against the gravity of alleged corruption.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 - Indian Penal Code - Section 120-B - Bail application in corruption case - Applicants alleged to be involved in corrupt practices with public officials in tender payments - Prosecution primarily relies on intercepted calls and WhatsApp messages - Defense argues lack of credible evidence and violation of privacy rights under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 2, 6, 14)

(B) Bail - Grant of - Applicants have been in custody for over seven months without trial and charges not firmly substantiated with direct evidence - Age and health conditions of applicants considered - Court grants bail on conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and assures necessary legal formalities are followed. (Paras 13-15)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were accused of offering bribes to public officials to expedite payments for work their company executed for BECIL. The CBI initiated proceedings based on information of corrupt practices leading to their arrest on allegations of delivering bribes to officials. Judicial custody since 25.04.2023 was noted.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution's evidence mostly consisted of inadmissible intercepted communications without corroborating direct evidence of bribery, coupled with the applicants' prolonged detention without the commencement of trial justified bail.

Issues: The critical issues included evaluating the sufficiency of evidence for bribery charges, the overshadowing privacy infringements regarding call intercepts, and the appropriateness of the duration of pre-trial custody.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that due to the lack of direct evidence and the applicants' prolonged custody without trial, bail was warranted, balancing the rights of the accused under Article 21 and the seriousness of the allegations. The need for a solid evidentiary basis for the charges against applicants was underscored. (Paras 14-16)

Result: Bail granted to the applicants under stated conditions.

Table of Content
1. joint applications and common legal situation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court's observations regarding the framework and nature of the evidence. (Para 3)
3. details of bribery allegations. (Para 4)
4. defense arguments against prosecution's claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
5. individual circumstances of applicants. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. prosecution’s call for denial of bail. (Para 12)
7. court's assessment of bail eligibility. (Para 13 , 14)
8. conditions for granting bail. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh, J.

1. All the above referred three bail applications pertain to one and the same case and the case of all the applicants is similar thus, these bail applications are being decided by this common order.

2. These bail applications have been moved on behalf of the applicants in F.I.R. dated 24.4.2023, bearing No. RC 216/2023/A0004, Police Station-CBI/AC-I, New Delhi, under Sections-7/8/9/10/12 of P. C. Act and Section-120-B IPC with prayer to enlarge the applicants on bail during trial.

3. Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms Somya Chaturvedi and Sri Swetash Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Gyan Prakash learned Deputy Solicitor General along with Sri Sanjay Yadav learned counsel for Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and perused the record.

4. According to prosecution version, an information was received by Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred as CBI) that Sri Ramit Lala, General Manager, Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise of Government of India (hereinafter referred as BECIL) under Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, is indulging in corrupt practices in collusion with unknown officials by extending favours to private companies in tender process and expeditious payment of their pending bills in exchange of huge bribe money from the representatives of such private companies. In that process information was developed that Ms Monica Dhawan, Managing Director of M/s Fusion Corporate Solution Private Limited, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to the said ‘FCSPL’) along with her sister Charu Khanna, Business head, and her father Mr J.M.P. Khanna, also a director of the said company, is pursuing various tenders of the different ministries and government departments floated by BECIL and for clearing their pending bills for the already executed works awarded by the BECIL. As per information, Ms. Monica Dhawan approached Ramit Lala for favours in getting work orders. On 17.4.2023 Ramit Lala enquired from Ms. Monica Dhawan about pending bills of her company with BECIL and he asked her for a meeting. On 19.4.2023 Ramit Lala asked Ms. Charu Khanna to meet him in Delhi and later Ms. Charu Khanna informed Ramit Lala that amount could not be arranged. On 24.4.2023 the CBI came to know that Ms. Charu Khanna has told her sister Monica Dhawan that Ramit Lala is pestering her for payment of amount and she is tired of making excuses and she asked her father to arrange the money and that one Vishnu, driver of Charu Khanna, was asked to deliver bribe amount to Ramit Lala at his office. On the basis of these facts, a regular case was registered by the CBI.

On receipt of above information that driver Vishnu was likely to deliver the bribe amount to Ramit Lala at his office, a trap team, including two independent witnesses, was constituted and while the CBI team was on the way, the source informed that a packet containing bribe amount has been delivered by driver Vishnu Bahadur Bika to Ramit Lala near his office and thereafter the trap team was divided into two parts and one of the team apprehended Vishnu Bahadur Bika at Yamuna bridge near Akshardham temple, New Delhi, who disclosed that he has delivered a packet containing cash to Ramit Lala under instructions of Monica Dhawan. Meanwhile Ramit Lala was also located at the ‘Weekend Wine and More’ in Sector 101 NOIDA by second team and on his disclosure, the said packet cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top