Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
B. Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and positions of parties (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of the prosecution's investigation and evidence (Para 8 , 11) |
| 3. statement of the accused and defense evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments and submissions made in appeal (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. appellant's contention regarding the evidence and procedural flaws (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. cbi's rebuttals and refutations of the appellant's claims (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 7. court's assessment of the evidentiary discrepancies (Para 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 8. final judgment and acquittal of the appellant (Para 78) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The appellant B. Tiwari, S/o Sh. P.S. Tiwari vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 19.05.2001 of the Special Judge, THC, Delhi in RC No.40(A)/93-DLI whereby the appellant herein, posted as Assistant Manager of the Delhi State Industry Development Corporation and co-accused Mr. R.K. Pandey, a private person were both held guilty of the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, r/w Sections 7, 13 (2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for having entered into a criminal conspiracy t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
