SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
B. Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The appellant B. Tiwari, S/o Sh. P.S. Tiwari vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 19.05.2001 of the Special Judge, THC, Delhi in RC No.40(A)/93-DLI whereby the appellant herein, posted as Assistant Manager of the Delhi State Industry Development Corporation and co-accused Mr. R.K. Pandey, a private person were both held guilty of the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, r/w Sections 7, 13 (2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for having entered into a criminal conspiracy to receive illegal gratification for showing a favour to Mr. Satish Kumar (the complainant) in pursuance of which conspiracy, the appellant herein being a public servant abused his official position and demanded a sum of Rs.2,000/- from the complainant by directing him to hand over the bribe money to the accused no.2 i.e. Mr. R.K. Pandey who accordingly accepted the same other than legal remuneration on 11.06.1993.

2. As per the prosecution version, the complainant Mr. Satish Kumar had visited the Khichripur Office of DSIDC for taking possession of a working shed No.40 allotted to him by the DSI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top