ANU MALHOTRA
B. Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Thr. CBI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case facts and charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 8) |
| 2. details regarding sentencing and bail. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. accused's denial and defense arguments. (Para 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. discussion on contradictory evidence. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. final order allowing the appeal and acquitting the appellant. (Para 78) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. - The appellant B. Tiwari, S/o Sh. P.S. Tiwari vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 19.05.2001 of the Special Judge, THC, Delhi in RC No.40(A)/93-DLI whereby the appellant herein, posted as Assistant Manager of the Delhi State Industry Development Corporation and co-accused Mr. R.K. Pandey, a private person were both held guilty of the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860, r/w Sections 7 , 13 (2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for having entered into a criminal conspiracy to receive illegal gratification for showing a favour to Mr. Satish Kumar (the complainant) in pursuance of which conspiracy, the appellant herein being a public servant abused his official position and demanded a sum of Rs. 2,000/- from the complainant by directing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.