SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2228

SAURABH LAVANIA
Maiku @ Maiku Lal – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director o Consolidation, Ayodhya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Nazim Ali Siddique
For the Respondent: Mohan Singh

JUDGMENT :

SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

1. Heard Sri Nazim Ali Siddique, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following main reliefs:

    “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 03.11.2023 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya in Revision No. 2456 of 2023 U/s 48 U.P.C.H. Act Computerized Case No. 2022540423000000174, Maiku vs. Gram Sabha and others and the judgment and order dated 25.05.2023 passed by the Consolidation Officer Rudauli, District Ayodhya in Case No. 119/Bajdayra/2023, State Versus Maiku as contained in Annexure nos. 1 and 2 respectively to this writ petition.

    (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to expunge the forged entry of the alleged order dated 29.03.2005 passed in Case No. 465 of 2005 and correct the record within the time bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

    (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus thereby restra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top