SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, JJ.
Devendra Shukla @ Mantu And Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.689 of 2019, Criminal Appeal No.299 of 2019
Decided on : 20-12-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ramesh Chandra Yadav, Saurabh Yadav
For the Respondent: G.A., Kuldeep Johri

The court modified the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the lack of premeditated intent and the nature of the incident as a sudden altercation.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 148, 452, 302/149, 323/149, 504, 506 - Arms Act, 1959 - Section 4/25 - Conviction and sentencing of accused for life imprisonment under Section 302/149 IPC, along with various other sentences for assault and unlawful assembly - The court found that the incident occurred during a family dispute, with no premeditated intent to kill, leading to a modification of the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 (Part-I) IPC. (Paras 1, 36)

(B) Criminal Law - The prosecution must prove the genesis of the incident and the intent behind the actions of the accused - The absence of evidence regarding prior threats and the unexplained injuries on the accused raised doubts about the prosecution's case. (Paras 28, 32)

Facts of the case:
The incident occurred on Holi when the accused attacked the informant's father, leading to his death from stab wounds. The informant had previously lodged a dowry harassment complaint against the accused's family, which created animosity. (Paras 2, 25)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence regarding the intent to kill, leading to a reduction in the charge to Section 304 IPC and a modification of the sentence to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. (Paras 36)

Issues: The main issues included whether the incident was premeditated and whether the prosecution proved the necessary elements of the crime. (Paras 28, 34)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the prosecution failed to establish the premeditated intent to kill and that the incident arose from a sudden altercation, warranting a lesser charge. (Paras 34, 36)

Result: Appeals partly allowed, conviction modified from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 (Part-I) IPC with a reduced sentence. (Paras 37)

JUDGMENT :

(Per: Hon’ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.)

1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2018, passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, E.C. Act, Pilibhit in Sessions Trial No.199 of 2015 (State Vs. Devendra Shukla @ Mantu & Ors.), under Sections 148, 452, 302/149, 323/149, 504, 506 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.529 of 2015, Police Station – Sungarhi, District – Pilibhit; Sessions Trial Nos.200 of 2015 (State Vs. Rahul Shukla Alias Rinku), 201 of 2015 (State Vs. Devendra Shukla @ Mantu), 202 of 2015 (State Vs. Mahesh Shukla), under Section 4/25 Arms Act, arising out of Case Crime Nos.530 of 2015, 531 of 2015, 532 of 2015, Police Station – Sungarhi, District – Pilibhit; whereby the accused appellants Devendra Shukla @ Mantu, Rahul Shukla Alias Rinku and Mahesh Shukla have been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302/149 IPC alongwith fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment to undergo three months additional imprisonment; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 323/149 IPC; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 IPC; sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 452 IPC alongwith fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment to undergo two months additional imprisonment; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 504 IPC; sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 506 IPC; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 4/25 Arms Act alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment to undergo one month additional imprisonment. All the sentences are to run concurrently.

2. At 11.45 AM on 6.3.2015, informant Neelu Rupali Pandey was at her house alongwith her parents and brother Mudit Mishra when accused Devendra Shukla @ Mantu, Rahul Shukla Alias Rinku armed with knife, Triloki Nath Shukla @ Tillu armed with gupti (a sharp edged instrument), Anuj Shukla and Mahesh Shukla armed with knife entered informant’s house at Nai Basti, near Chatri crossing within Police Station Sungarhi, District Pilibhit and in furtherance of their common intention attacked informant’s father. Accused Mahesh Shukla exhorted by saying that informant’s father had dared to lodge a report against his daughter so he be not spared. Accused persons then assaulted informant’s father with knife and gupti and when other family members tried to save them, they (family members) were also beaten and by extending threats the accused left. Out of fear of accused none from the neighbourhood came to their rescue. Informant brought his injured father to the police station. Some time before this incident accused Mahesh Shukla had allegedly extended life threat to informant’s father on phone. The incident was reported by the informant vide her written report dated 6.3.2015 which is exhibited as Ex.Ka.1 during trial. On the strength of the above written report First Information Report came to be lodged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC at Police Station Sungarhi, District Pilibhit on 6.3.2015 at 12.20 PM.

3. The investigation proceeded on the basis of the FIR and the inquest was conducted on 6.3.2015 at 2.30 PM. The inquest witnesses were of the view that deceased Nirmal Mishra has been done to death apparently on account of injuries caused by knife and to ascertain the correct cause of death postmortem be conducted. The body was sealed and sent for postmortem. Postmortem was also conducted on the same day. The autopsy surgeon found existence of following ante-mortem injuries and the cause of death was reported as shock and hemorrhage due to following ante-mortem injuries caused by stabbing:-

    “1. Abrasion on middle of chest 4 cm x 2 cm red in color

    2. Punctured wound 2 cm x 0.5 cm bone deep on left side chest 8 cm below left nipple red in color

    3. Stitched wound 3 cm width on left side abdomen 16 cm below from left nipple horizontally placed on exploration it was pun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top