SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1765

JAYANT BANERJI
Furkan Mukhtar Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Harsh Vikram, Dharm Vir Jaiswal

ORDER :

1. Heard Sri Harsh Vikram, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. Under challenge in the present petition is the order dated 10.5.2019, whereby the Collector, Rampur in Case No. 00271 of 2018, under Section 47A of the Indian STAMP ACT , 1899(hereinafter referred to as the Act) held that the land in question reflects residential usage and, accordingly, assessed deficiency of stamp duty and penalty. Further under challenge is an order of Collector, Rampur dated 2.9.2019, passed on an application for review of the previous order dated 10.5.2019, whereby, the order dated 10.5.2019 was modified and proportionate amount of stamp duty payable by each of the tenure holder was specified. Also under challenge is the order dated 21.1.2021, passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Stamp), Moradabad Division in an appeal under Section 56(1A) of the Act filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid orders dated 10.5.2019 and 2.9.2019, whereby the appeal was partly allowed by reducing the amount of penalty imposed.

3. The facts in brief as mentioned in the petition, are that Plot No. 400 having an area of 1.306 hectare situated in Vill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top