SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1739

JAYANT BANERJI
Vinod Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.P. Paul, B.B. Paul
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

Jayant Banerji, J.

1. Heard Shri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay Goswami, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3.

2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.3.2009 passed by the Assistant Commissioner Stamp, Mathura in proceedings under Section 47A of the Indian STAMP ACT , 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') as well as the order passed by the Commissioner dated 28.7.2009 passed in Revision No. 163 of 2009.

3. It has been stated in the writ petition that plot nos. 212 and 213 having a total area of 1.214 hectare situated in Village Jaisingh Pura Banger, Tehsil and District Mathura was purchased by the petitioner and the respondent no. 4 by means of a registered sale deed dated 14.11.2002. Relying upon an audit report, the Sub-Registrar, Mathura-Ist reported to the Collector, Mathura by means of his letter dated 15.9.2004, that there was deficiency of Stamp duty of Rs. 4,10,600/-. Thereafter, proceedings under Section 47A of the Act were initiated and a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner filed his objections stating that the land in question i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top