SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1761

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, SYED AFTAB HUSAIN RIZVI, JJ.
Sayeed and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 6693 Of 2010
Decided On : 27-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Nayan, I.M. Khan and Sudhanshu Srivastava.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302 and 307 - Arms Act - Sections 25/4 - Conviction and sentencing of accused-appellants for murder and attempted murder established through direct evidence of eyewitnesses and corroborated by medical evidence; no perverse findings by trial court. (Paras 2, 22)

(B) Admission of evidence - In cases of direct evidence, the absence of independent witnesses does not invalidate eyewitness testimony when corroborated. (Paras 22)

(C) Motive - In direct evidence cases, the absence of a clearly established motive does not preclude conviction. (Paras 20)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for the murder of two brothers and attempted murder of a third, following a violent attack post-prayer at a Mosque. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The prosecution case was proven through consistent witness testimony, physical evidence, and forensic analysis, supporting the trial court's conviction. (Paras 22)

Issues: Whether eyewitnesses' testimony can be relied upon despite their relation to the victims, and whether discrepancies in the FIR affect the trial's outcome. (Paras 12, 20)

Ratio Decidendi: Eyewitnesses, including an injured party, provided credible accounts of the crime, with minor discrepancies not undermining the overall truth of the testimony. There is no need for independent witnesses if the evidence is consistent and corroborative. (Paras 12, 22)

Result: Criminal appeal dismissed, affirming the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment against the appellants.

Table of Content
1. details on the prosecution case and witness accounts. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 10)
2. postmortem details affirming cause of death. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments against witness credibility and evidence reliability. (Para 12 , 14 , 16 , 18)
4. court's reliance on direct evidence and witness testimony. (Para 20 , 22)

ORDER :

(Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi, J.)

1. Heard Sri I.M. Khan, learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This criminal appeal has been filed against the common judgment and order dated 26.08.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, court no. 6 Saharanpur in S.T.s No. 742 of 2005 (State vs. Sayeed alias Shahid) in case crime no. 448/05 under Section 302 and 307 IPC, S.T. No. 744 of 2005 (State vs. Sayeed alias Shahid) in case crime no. 453/05 under Sections 25 /4 of ARMS ACT , and S.T. No. 746 of 2005 (State vs. Zahid) Case Crime No. 470/05, under Section 25 /4 of ARMS ACT , P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District-Saharanpur, convicting the accused-appellants (Sayeed @ Shahid and Zahid) under Section 302 /34 and sentencing each of them to undergo life imprisonment, and a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, three months simple imprisonment, under Section 307 /34 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs. 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine, three months simple imprisonment and further convicting the accused-appellant (Sayeed @ Shahid) under Section 25 /4 of ARMS ACT and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, one month simple imprisonment and accused-appellant (Zahid) under Section 25 /4 of ARMS ACT and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and imposing a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, one month simple imprisonment. All the sentences to run concurrently.

3. In brief the prosecution case is that complainant-Furkan gave a written information dated 09.09.2005 at Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Saharanpur that today on 09.09.2005 at about 7:00 p.m. he along with his father Rashid Ahmad and brothers Nasir, Kabir and Abdul Qadir after offering Namaz were coming out from the Mosque situated at pooja road, village-Rasoolpur when accused-persons Islam, Shahid, Zahil (correct name-Zahid) and Israr who are the resident of the same village armed with knives/chhura and saying that today no one should be let alive suddenly with the intention to kill, attacked them. His brothers Nasir and Kabir got seriously injured and Abdul Qadir also received serious injuries. Fear and panic prevailed. The devotees coming out from the Mosque ran helter-skelter bare footed to save their lives and the neighbourers out of fear shut the doors and windows of their houses. All the four accused persons seriously injured the three brothers of the complainant. Complainant and his brothers ran towards their house to save their lives, the accused-persons chased them and entered into their house because of which the female members of the house ran outside towards the forest to save their lives. Injured Nasir, Kabir and Qadir were taken to the District Hospital by the complainant and his father with the aid of other villagers where the doctor declared Nasir and Kabir dead while Abdul Qadir is under treatment. The incident has been witnessed by the complainant and his father and other villagers in the electric light.

4. On the aforesaid written information, case crime no. 448 of 2005 under Sections 307 and 302 IPC was registered against Islam, Sayeed, Zahil and Israr all sons of Phullu and the investigation commenced, the inquest report and related papers of the dead bodies of Nasir and Kabir were prepared, the dead bodies were sealed and sent for post-mortem. The Investigating Officer visited the place of occurrence and collected the blood stained and plain soil from the spot and sealed it in separate containers, prepared the site plan

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top