Satyaprakash vs State Of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 1993

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 1993

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, DEEPAK VERMA
Satyaprakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohammad Khalid, Pawan Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: G.A.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for fair investigation (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. magistrate's powers under section 156(3) cr.p.c. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. dismissal of petition with liberty to apply (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent authorities to conclude the fair investigation of Case Crime No. 610 of 2021, under Sections 363 , 366 I.P.C., P.S. Gunnor, District Sambhal.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the police is acting in collusion with the accused persons and as yet neither the accused persons have been arrested nor any charge sheet has been filed against the accused persons.

4. Admittedly, petitioner is aggrieved by the manner of investigation said to have been conducted against private respondents.

5. The Apex Court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe Vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage , (2016) 6 SCC 277 , following its earlier decision in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. , (2008) 2 SCC 409 , held as follows:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document