Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Kumar Yadav vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 1994

RAHUL CHATURVEDI
Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Awadhesh Kumar Sharma, Sharda Vishwakarma, Swati Agrawal Srivastava
For the Respondent: G.A.

Table of Content
1. overview of the appeal and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. state's non-participation in the proceedings. (Para 5)
3. allegations and prior accusations against the victim. (Para 6 , 7)
4. defense's arguments regarding medical examination and possibility of false claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. conditions set for grant of bail and considerations for safety. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
6. bail granted and previous order set aside. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

Rahul Chaturvedi, J.

(Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.... of 2021)

1. Heard Ms. Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

2. This criminal appeal under Section 14 A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short "S.C./S.T. Act") has been filed assailing the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad while rejecting the Bail Application No.6263 of 2021 (State vs. Dinesh Yadav @ Michai Yadav and others) in Case Crime No.780 of 2021, under Sections 328 , 343, 376-D, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document