JUDGMENT :

RAJEEV MISRA, J.

1. Heard Mr. Pradeep Kumar, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned standing counsel representing respondents 1, to 4 and Mr. Brij Kumar Saroj, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sudhir Bharti, the learned counsel representing respndent-5.

2. Perused the record.

3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 18.01.2023 passed by respondent-4, Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil-Sadar, District-Maharajganj in Case No. 929 of 2023 (Sahabuddin Vs. State) under Section 67 of U.P. Land Revenue Code 2006 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition) and the order dated 27.10.2023 passed by respondent-2, Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Maharajganj in Appeal No. 929 of 2023 (Shahabuddin Vs. Gaon Sabha) under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition, whereby the appeal filed by petitioner against order dated 18.02.2023 has been dismissed.

4. Present writ petition came up for admission on 19.01.2024 and this Court passed the following order:

“Heard Mr. Piyush Patel, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel representing respondents 1 to 4 and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, the learned counsel representing respon