SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1831

RAJEEV MISRA
Imtiyaz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rahul Sahai
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mr. Saumitra, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Rahul Sahai, the learned counsel for petitioners, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents-1,2,3 and Mr. Vijay Bhan Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. R.P. Shukla, the learned counsel representing respondent-4.

2. Perused the record.

3. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 20.6.2023, passed by respondent-3, Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Ballia, in Case No.266 of 2023 (Gram Sabha v. Imtiyaz and Others) under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) as well as the order dated 13.10.2023, passed by respondent-2 District Magistrate/Collector, Ballia in Appeal No. 1102 of 2023 (Imtiyaz Ahmad and Others v. Gram Sabha Turtipar and Others) under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition), whereby aforesaid appeal filed by petitioners against the order dated 20.6.2023 has been dismissed.

4. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel for state respondents-1,2,3 and Mr. Vijay Bhan Singh Advocate, holding brief of Mr. R.P. Shukla, the learned counsel representing respondent-4, Gaon Sabha submit that present writ petition may be d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top