SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 47

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Manjive Shukla, J.
Baldhir – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Sangam Lal Kesharwani
For the Respondent: G.A.

Table of Content
1. vehicle confiscation (Para 2 , 3)
2. consideration of merits (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. confiscation procedure (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21)
4. revision allowed (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Sangam Lal Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing for the revisionist and Sri Brijendra Pratap Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.

3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the revisionist is registered owner of Innova Car bearing Registration No. HR78-3205. The police recovered ten grams of smack from the aforesaid vehicle while the revisionist was moving in the said vehicle. The police had registered a criminal case as Case Crime No. 509 of 2021 under Section 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 in Police Station Gangoh, District Saharanpur. The Investigating Officer, after collecting evidence against the revisionist, had filed Charge- Sheet before the competent court in respect of the offence committed by the revisionist punishable under Section 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

5. Learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S.)/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Saharanpur had passed an order on 20.06.2023 whereby, the application filed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top