IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shailendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for appointment as assistant teacher on compassionate grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. identified issues regarding the legality of government orders. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments from petitioners and respondents regarding the validity of compassionate appointments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. constitutional provisions governing appointments to government services. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. general principles governing compassionate appointments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. case law supporting the rationale for compassionate appointments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. judicial principles governing the limitations of compassionate appointments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. statutory framework governing compassionate appointments. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. interpretation of 'suitable employment' in the context of compassionate appointments. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. discussion on the impact of educational qualifications on compassionate appointments. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 11. importance of merit in the appointment process. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 12. interplay of constitutional law with compassionate appointments. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 13. discussion on the releva |
Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana
Director of Education (Secondary) v. Pushpendra Kumar
N.C. Santhosh v. State of Karnataka and others
Director of Treasuries in Karnataka and another v. Somyashree
State of Haryana and another v. Ankur Gupta
State of Uttar Pradesh and others v. Premlata
Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India and another
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India and others
Avinash Nagra v. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti and others
Susmita Basu and others v. Ballygunge Siksha Samity and others
State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale and others
Ram Sharan Maurya and others v. State of U.P. and others
Devesh Sharma v. Union of India and others
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and others
National Institute of Technology and others v. Niraj Kumar Singh
Malpe Vishwanath Acharya and others v. State of Maharashtra and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.