SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2363

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Praveen Kumar Giri, JJ.
Dr Manoj Kumar Rawat - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Up And 5 Others - Respondent
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 117 of 2025
Decided On :  


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Alka Upadhyay,Manish Tiwari,Naveen Kumar Tripathi,Prabhakar Awasthi,Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: Varun Dev Sharma,Ankit Shukla, Avneesh Tripathi,C.S.C.,Gagan Mehta,Parijat Mishra

The Director's authority to place candidates under the repealed U.P. Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980, ceased with the enactment of the U.P. Education Service Selection Commission Act, 2023.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 - Section 13(4) - U.P. Education Service Selection Commission Act, 2023 - Jurisdiction of Director - The Director's order placing the appellant at Meerut College was set aside as it was made after the repeal of the 1980 Act, which stripped him of such authority. (Paras 8, 10, 15, 18)

(B) Appointment Process - The vacancy at Meerut College arose after the resignation of the previous principal, necessitating a fresh requisition to the Commission for appointment, which was not followed. (Paras 15, 18)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was initially placed in the waiting list for Principal at Meerut College but was later placed at Bajrang College, where he did not join due to alleged failure to receive an appointment letter. The Director's placement order was challenged by the officiating principal.

Findings of Court:
The Director lacked jurisdiction to place the appellant after the repeal of the previous Act, affirming the decision of the learned Single Judge.

Issues: Whether the Director had the authority to place the appellant after the repeal of the U.P. Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980, and the legitimacy of the placement order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Director's powers under the repealed Act did not survive the enactment of the new Act, thus rendering his order without jurisdiction.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. placement procedures for educational appointments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. authority of the director in placement decisions. (Para 4 , 5)
3. jurisdictional limits post-repeal of the act. (Para 10 , 12)
4. no jurisdiction to fill substantive vacancies under new act. (Para 14 , 17)
5. court's dismissal of the appeal based on jurisdiction. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

(Per: Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.)

1. This appeal arises out of an order dated 17.02.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ-A No. 15433 of 2024, whereby, the placement of the appellant pursuant to order of Director dated 15.01.2024 in Meerut College, Meerut, has been set aside.

2. The undisputed facts of the case as are noticed by learned Single Judge are that the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Commission") issued Advertisement No. 49 of 2019 inviting applications for appointment to 219 posts of Principal in aided Post-Graduate Colleges in the State of Uttar Pradesh. This advertisement included the post of Principal in Meerut College, Meerut. The appellant participated in the selection proceedings and was ultimately placed in the waiting list. It transpires that one Dr. Sachchidanand Sharma was placed as Principal in Meerut College, Meerut. He joined pursuant to his placement and worked in the college for nearly 1 and 1/2 year, whereafter, he left. The post of principal in Meerut College, Meerut, has, thereafter, fallen vacant.

3. The records reveal that the appellant though was initially placed in the waiting list but he secured appointment on account of vacancies which were found to have existed in the recruitment exercise and was placed at Bajrang Post-Graduate College, Ballia. The placement order of appellant at Bajrang Post-Graduate College, Ballia, dated 03.08.2022 is on record of this paper book at page 100. It is undisputed that the appellant never joined at Bajrang Post-Graduate College, Ballia and the parties are at issue with regard to reason on account of which he had not joined. The appellant states that he was not issued appointment letter by the Committee of Management. The other version is that the appellant never appeared before the Managing Committee for joining. There are also communications on records to show that the appellant had expressed personal difficulties as being the reason on account of which he made request for his placement in any other college. It is on account of such request made by the appellant that the Director passed the order dated 15.01.2024 placing the appellant at Meerut College, Meerut. It is against this order of the Director dated 15.01.2024 that the writ petition came to be filed by the officiating principal of the college questioning the placement order of the respondent dated 15.01.2024.

4. Learned Single Judge has taken note of the facts of the case and has come to the conclusion that the respondent Dr. Anjali Mittal was given charge of the office of Principal after Dr. Sachchidanand Sharma resigned from the post of principal and that she was entitled to continue being the senior most teacher in the college. Learned Single Judge has also opined that by the time order was passed by the Director allocating Bajrang Post-Graduate College, Ballia, to the appellant, the process of appointment had come to an end and it was not open for the Director to have passed the impugned placement order.

5. When the matter was heard on the last occasion, an issue was raised as to whether there was any default on the part of the appellant in joining at Bajrang Post-Graduate College, Ballia or was it due to default of the Managing Committee in not issuing him appointment that he could not join. In order to resolve the controversy, we directed the concerned Director to examine the records and file his personal affidavit. An affidavit has been filed by the Director stating as under in paragraph nos. 6 and 7:

"6. That as per the information provided by the Principal Shri Bajrang Post Gradua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top