SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD 
Ajay Bhanot, J.
 
Saurabh Lal – Appellant
Vs.
State Of U.P. And 3 Others – Respondent  
WRIT - A No. - 16327 of 2022
Decided On : 10-3-2025
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Niraj Tiwari
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Vivek Ratan Agrawal Hon'ble

A major penalty's adverse impact on compassionate appointment claims ceases once the penalty is effaced, particularly after a promotion.

Headnote:(A) Appointment on Compassionate Grounds - Government of India Guidelines - The claim for compassionate appointment was denied based on the unsatisfactory service record of the petitioner's father, who had faced a major penalty. The court held that the penalty was effaced after promotion, thus invalidating its use as a disqualification. (Paras 1, 6, 7)

(B) Disciplinary Action - The court determined that where a major penalty was imposed but later effaced, it should not impact the consideration for compassionate appointment. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought appointment on compassionate grounds after his father's promotion post-penalty. The claim was rejected based on the father's service record at the time of death.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the impugned order and directed a fresh consideration of the application for compassionate appointment.

Issues: Whether the major penalty imposed on the petitioner's father could be used to deny compassionate appointment after its effacement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the major penalty's adverse effects ceased post-promotion, and thus should not affect the compassionate appointment application.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment declined due to father's service record. (Para 1 , 2)
2. major penalty's impact on compassionate appointment invalidated post-promotion. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. impugned order set aside; fresh consideration of application mandated. (Para 7 , 8)
4. writ petition allowed as indicated. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Bhanot, J.

Heard Sri Niraj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Ratan Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondents.

1. By the impugned order dated 03.03.2021 the claim of the petitioner for grant of appointment on compassionate ground has been declined. The impugned order speaks thus:-

"With reference to your application on the captioned subject, we have to inform you that the matter was placed before the competent authority and in terms of the Government of India guidelines and as per the Scheme, your request for compassionate appointment has not been considered favourably by the Bank considering the unsatisfactory service record of Achhale of in terms of the Scheme."

2. A major penalty was imposed upon his father for a period of two years by order dated 31.05.2012. After the expiry of the aforesaid period the petitioner's father was granted promotion to the post of Manager of Union of India, Branch Collectrate, District Mau, U.P. Thereafter, he was further promoted as Deputy Branch Head at Branch Amiliya, District Rewa (U.P.).

3. In this wake it cannot be contended that the records of the service of petitioner's father was less than satisfactory.

4. As per the impugned order the petitioner's claim for appointment on compassionate ground have been invalidated on the footing of the following provisions of the Scheme of appointment on compassionate ground:

"1. A Note No. HR MPRD 119:2017 dated 01/03/2017 for consideration of disciplinary action cases in the Scheme of Appointment on Compassionate Grounds is deliberated in the HR Sub-Committee of the Board of Directors today i.e. on 21.03.2017.

2. The Committee, while concurring with the modifications, made the following observations:

A) Committee for Compassionate Appointment will be authorised to decline all requests for compassionate appointment/ex-gratia payment in cases where major penalty was imposed on the ex-employee while in service, and/or where disciplinary action which was pending at the time of death of the ex-employee would have resulted in imposition of major penalty;"

5. The aforesaid disqualification will attach to an employee against whom major penalty was imposed and the remains in the record at the time of his death.

6. In the instant case as seen above the major penalty stood effaced two years after its imposition, and its adverse impact did not continue subsequent to the promotion of the petitioner's father. The said penalty imposed upon the petitioner's father cannot be invoked to decline his application for the appointment on compassionate grounds.

7. In the wake preceding discussion the impugned order dated 03.03.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 is liable to be set aside and is set aside.

8. The application of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground shall be considered afresh as per law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

9. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top