SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2534

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Ratiram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Trivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised. As informed by learned A.G.A., notice has been served to the informant on 30.11.2024.

2. Heard Sri Anurag Upadhyay, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Abhishek Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 557 of 2024, U/S 64(1), 351(2) B.N.S. and 3/4 POCSO Act , Police Station Roza, District Shahjahanpur, during the pendency of trial.

4. As per prosecution story, the applicant and the co-accused person Babu @ Akash are stated to have forcibly taken the daughter of the informant in a car and are stated to have recorded an indecent video of the victim on 2.9.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. It is stated that he has nothing to do with the said offence. It is further stated that the victim is major. As per ossification test report, her age is 18 years.

6. It is further stated that there is no time of offence mentioned i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top