SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Yogesh Ahirwar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pandey Balkrishna
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Pandey Balkrishna, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the record.

3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.82 of 2024, under Sections 376(1), 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Mahila Thana, District-Jhansi, during the pendency of trial.

PROSECUTION STORY:

4. The applicant is stated to have spiked the soft-drink of the victim and rendered her unconscious on 9.5.2024. The applicant and other co-accused person are stated to have gang-raped her. There are allegations that two ladies had video recorded the said act. Subsequently, the applicant is stated to have forged certain documents and got the marriage registered before the Registrar, Jhansi. The said documents were found fake and the marriage was dissolved.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT:

5. The applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case.

6. The FIR is delayed by about more than three months and there is no explanation of the said delay caused.

7. The marriage of the applicant and victim was solemnized before the Registrar on 10.5.2024, and subsequent to it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top