Mahendra Kumar Jain vs Mohammad Imran - 2025 Supreme(All) 2706

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(All) 2706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Mahendra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Imran – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rama Goel Bansal,Shalini Goel
For the Respondent: Ramesh Kumar Shukla,Smriti Gupta

JUDGMENT :

Ajit Kumar, J.

1. Heard Ms. Shivangi Nanda, learned Advocate holding brief of Ms. Rama Goel Bansal, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Ms.Smriti Gupta, learned Advocate appearing for landlord respondents.

2. The tenant petitioner is before this Court questioning the judgment and decree passed by the Judge Small Causes, Jhansi in SCC Suit No. 17 of 2015 decreeing the suit for eviction as well as the judgment and order dated 12.04.2025 passed by Additional District Judge Court No.4 Jhansi affirming the judgment of the trial court.

3. Ms. Nanda, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner assailing the judgment and degree, submitted before the Court that tenant petitioner having made sufficient deposit of arrears of rent due to be paid as per notice coupled with interest, court fee and expenses, was entitled to statutory benefit provided for under Section 20 (4) of the U.P. Urban Building Control of Letting Rent and eviction Act 1972. She argued that the admitted rate of rent as per the plaint itself was Rs. 80 per month and the amount that was due to be as per claim in the notice was with effect from 01.04.2013 till 12.05.2015 with further two months of June and July,