Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
ALOK MATHUR
Becha Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alok Mathur, J.
1. Heard Shri Ravi Shanker Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Badrish Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.08.2001 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lucknow thereby rejecting the application preferred by petitioner.
3. The petitioner moved an application under Section 34 of the LAND REVENUE ACT for mutation of his name in place of name of recorded tenure holder on the basis of registered sale deed whereby the petitioner had purchased a plot of land Khasra No.874 Khatauni No.134 area 6 Biswa situated at Village Sikroori, Pergana, Tehsil and District Lucknow from its recorded tenure holder Shri Kailash Chandra Yadav son of Late Shri Baboo Lal.
4. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the area of Khasra No.874, total area was 2 Bighas 9 Biswa, out of which the petitioner has purchased only 6 Biswas of land which was a fragment of the total holding of the recorded tenure holder. On the application of the petitioner for mutation, a notice was issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lu
The court ruled that land transfer injunctions under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act do not apply where the area is not consolidated, especially after the cancellation of relevant n....
Transfer of a share in land is distinct from fragmentation; statutory clarifications in the U.P Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act establish this legal distinction.
Improper adjudication and flawed processes in property vesting under U.P. Act rendered the vesting of property in the State unlawful, emphasizing the need for due process and fair administrative acti....
Point of law: opinion Section 8 is not attracted in the case of leases of land where the purposes of the leases is to use the land for the purpose of agriculture, horticulture, pisciculture etc. It i....
The Assistant Collector First Class is the sole authority to declare agricultural land transactions void under Section 166 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
A party must file timely objections under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, or claims related to land within the consolidation scheme are deemed invalid, and previous orders cannot be ....
Legal proceedings initiated after the issuance of consolidation notifications are invalid under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, as outlined in Section 5(2), and proper filing o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Sections 34 and 35 of the Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972, must be int....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
