Back
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Gauri Shankar – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of land dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents' objection to petitioners' claims (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners' claim of procedural correctness (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. timeliness of objections was critical under relevant acts. (Para 12) |
| 5. legal interpretations under act of 1953 (Para 14 , 19) |
| 6. court's observations on procedural failings (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 22) |
| 7. consequences of legal procedural errors (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. court found no merit in petitioners' claims. (Para 24) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Petitioners claimed that they were tenure holder of plot Nos. 179/2 area 0.897 hectare and 177 area 0.201 hectare situated at Tehsil Nazibabad, District Bijnor, along with other certain land. It was the case of petitioners that said plots of land were being used as abadi and for commercial purpose for last 30 years.
2. The village concerned was brought under consolidation scheme on 18/8/1992 when the notification under section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (for short “Act of 1953”) was issued. It was further case of the petitioners that after above referred notification, procee
A party must file timely objections under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, or claims related to land within the consolidation scheme are deemed invalid, and previous orders cannot be ....
Legal proceedings initiated after the issuance of consolidation notifications are invalid under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, as outlined in Section 5(2), and proper filing o....
Parties must show vested interest to contest consolidation proceedings; the Revisional Authority has the power to rectify procedural lapses under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act,....
Failure to file objections against the Statement of Principles under Section 9-B invokes the bar of Section 11-A, preventing subsequent claims in consolidation proceedings.
The U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act allows authorities to adjudicate on land rights even when a wrong provision is cited, as long as they possess the necessary jurisdiction.
Tenure Land - Once a dispute was recorded by Assistant Consolidation Officer and on objection being filed same was referred to Consolidation Officer, it is incumbent to Consolidation Officer to decid....
Petitioners' failure to timely assert their land rights bars their claim under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
Land consolidation – Determination of share of parties – Authorities cannot import principles of Hindu law while determining share of parties who are Mohammedans.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
