Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Rajnish Kumar
Faisal Siddiqui @ Mohd. Faisal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties presented before the court. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments about concealment and maintenance. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. concealment of facts is fraud. (Para 5) |
| 4. fraud nullifies judicial acts. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. obligation of parties to disclose truth. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. revision and delay application dismissed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajnish Kumar, J.
1. In deference to the order dated 26.05.2025, the parties are present in person.
2. The respondent no.2 states that she does not want mediation in the matter because earlier the revisionist had filed Application under Section 4 82 No.1605/2023(Mohd.Faisal and Others versus State of U.P. and Another) challenging the charge sheet and the summoning order dated 06.11.2020 passed in Criminal Case arising out of Case Crime No.3690/2020, under Section 4 98-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur. One of the contention of learned counsel for the revisionist in that case was that there is possibility of compromise between the parties being matrimonial dispute, therefore, this Court had referred the matter for mediation. However, the mediation fail
Fraud in legal proceedings invalidates judgments; parties must disclose material facts fully to maintain the integrity of the justice system.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
If an order has been passed by concealment of material facts, then it is duty of Court to correct facts if brought into its notice.
An aggrieved person may appeal against a judgment obtained through misrepresentation or concealment of facts, as such judgments are considered nullities.
Concealment of material facts in legal proceedings undermines judicial integrity, leading to dismissal of petitions.
It is bounden duty of court to uphold truth and do justice.
(1) Contempt of court – A litigant who attempts to pollute stream of justice or who touches pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final.(2) Grant of b....
FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING AND ANY BENEFIT OR ADVANTAGE ACQUIRED BY ANY PARTY THROUGH FRAUDULENT ACTS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO BE RETAINED BY SUCH PARTY.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
