IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Jaspreet Singh, J.
Keshav Prasad And Others – Petitioners
Versus
Consolidation. Commissioner, Lucknow And Others – Respondents
WRIT - B No. - 853 of 2024
Decided On : 23-09-2024
U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9(ka), 20, 42, and 48 - Writ petition challenging consolidation proceedings during COVID-19 pandemic - Petitioners alleged irregularities and lack of notice - Court found petitioners guilty of material concealment and fraudulent entries - Previous writ petitions dismissed on similar grounds - Petition dismissed with costs. (Paras 4-37)
Facts of the case:
Eight petitioners challenged consolidation proceedings in village Jamkhuri, alleging irregularities and lack of notice during COVID-19. They claimed orders were passed ex parte, violating their rights.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that the petitioners concealed material facts regarding previous petitions and fraudulent activities, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
Issues: The main issues were the validity of the consolidation proceedings and the petitioners' conduct in concealing previous litigations.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized the importance of full disclosure in legal proceedings, stating that concealment of material facts undermines the integrity of the judicial process.
Result: Petition dismissed with costs of Rs.50,000/- to be paid to the District Legal Aid Services Authority, Lucknow.
JUDGMENT :
Jaspreet Singh, J.
1. Heard Shri Rahul Roshan Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Dr. Krishna Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha.
2. Shri Rahul Roshan Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the rejoinder-affidavit which is taken on record.
3. To put the matter in a prespective, certain facts giving rise to the instant petition are being noticed hereinafter.
4. Eight petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief's which reads as under:-
5. The writ petition runs in 14 paragraphs. However, paragraphs 4 to 12 are being reproduced hereinafter for better appreciation of the contention as well as the response of the respective parties.
5. That in the mid of corona (covid-19) in year 2020 without given any notice to any villagers the authorities passed Dhara 9, Dhara-20, Dhara-21 and Dhara-42 opp. party no.4 has passed the order ex parte which is illegal and arbitrary because that time Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the interim order in whole country which was extended till 2021. The copy of order of Hon'ble Apex Court is being annexed herewith as Annexure No.2 to this writ petition.
6. That the brief facts of the case is that during the Covid-19 pandemic in village Jamkhuri, Pargana-Chanda Tehsil Lambhuwa, District-Sultanpur consolidation proceedings have been commenced and during consolidation proceedings several irregularities have been made in which orders under Section 9(ka) and Section 20 and 42 of U.P. consolidation of Holdings Act 1953 without giving any notice/information to the concern tenure holder and without giving opportunity to lead evidence CH-41 and CH-45 has been finalized some of the irregularities have been mentioned as below:-
a- In CH-41 and CH-45 the consolidation officer has rejected the entire area and chaks and there are several irregularities in chaks are has been mentioned wrongly and even parentage of tenure holders have been wrongly mentioned and there is no number mentioned in final map.
b. Chak No.643 in CH-23 has been recorded in favour of Ram Nayan in which old gate No.1170 has been left for Panchayat Bhawan but in order to grab that land nail and chak marg has been proposed while there is a chak marg existed.
c. Gata No.22/18. 2/4 and 2/8 was recorded as Naveen Parti but while making CH-41 and 45 without informing to the tenure holders that has been rejected and old gata no.2/2 area 0.632, 2/4 are 0.0063, 2/6 area 0.063, 2/16 area 0.151, 2/20 area 0.262, 63/2 area 0.358 and 23 mi area 0.208 from the tenure holders has been recorded as Naveen parti without even notice to the tenure holders.
d. In CH-11, recorded khata no.51 gata no.-63 Mi, 67, 69, 1031 has been rejected from the khata and recorded as Naveen parti and in gata no.63 name of Jai Narayan son of Chandrika and in gata no.67 Rajendra son of Krishna Ch
Smt. Shrisht Dhawan vss. M/s. Shaw Brothers 1992 AIR (SC) 1555
A.V. Papayya Sastry and others Vs. Government of A.P. and others; (2007) 4 SCC 221
Bhagwan Das Chela Balram Das Vs. District Magistrate Ambedkarnagar and others
Dalip Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2010) 2 SCC 114
Hari Narain v. Badri Das AIR 1963 SC 1558
Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 5 SCC 550 : JT 1996 (7) SC 135
Kusha Duruka Vs. The State of Odisha (2024) 4 SCC 432
Lazarus Estates and Smith v. East Elloe Rural District Council
Lazarus Estates Ltd. v. Beasley
Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and others; (2003) 8 SCC 319
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by LRs. V. Jagannath (dead) by LRs. & Ors.
Concealment of material facts in legal proceedings undermines judicial integrity, leading to dismissal of petitions.
It is bounden duty of court to uphold truth and do justice.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of approaching the court with clean hands and the consequences of suppression of material facts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
Personal action dies with the death of the person on the maxim action personalis moritur cum persona. But this operates only in a limited class of actions Ex delicto, such as action for damages for d....
Suppression of material facts disentitles a party to invoke equitable jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.