JASPREET SINGH
Keshav Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Consolidation. Commissioner, Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jaspreet Singh, J.
1. Heard Shri Rahul Roshan Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Dr. Krishna Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha.
2. Shri Rahul Roshan Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the rejoinder-affidavit which is taken on record.
3. To put the matter in a prespective, certain facts giving rise to the instant petition are being noticed hereinafter.
4. Eight petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief's which reads as under:-
Smt. Shrisht Dhawan vss. M/s. Shaw Brothers 1992 AIR (SC) 1555
A.V. Papayya Sastry and others Vs. Government of A.P. and others; (2007) 4 SCC 221
Bhagwan Das Chela Balram Das Vs. District Magistrate Ambedkarnagar and others
Dalip Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2010) 2 SCC 114
Hari Narain v. Badri Das AIR 1963 SC 1558
Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 5 SCC 550 : JT 1996 (7) SC 135
Kusha Duruka Vs. The State of Odisha (2024) 4 SCC 432
Lazarus Estates and Smith v. East Elloe Rural District Council
Lazarus Estates Ltd. v. Beasley
Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and others; (2003) 8 SCC 319
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by LRs. V. Jagannath (dead) by LRs. & Ors.
Concealment of material facts in legal proceedings undermines judicial integrity, leading to dismissal of petitions.
It is bounden duty of court to uphold truth and do justice.
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of approaching the court with clean hands and the consequences of suppression of material facts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
Personal action dies with the death of the person on the maxim action personalis moritur cum persona. But this operates only in a limited class of actions Ex delicto, such as action for damages for d....
Suppression of material facts disentitles a party to invoke equitable jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The court affirmed that authorities possess inherent jurisdiction to revoke fraudulent orders even in the absence of specific statutory provisions for review.
Orders and titles obtained through fraud are nullities; rightful ownership should not be barred by procedural delays attributable to such fraud.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.