Back
RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
Ram Prasad Rajouriya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present petition has been filed claiming to be in public interest praying for the following reliefs :
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondents authority to take suitable action against the respondents No.5 and 6 due to their illegal act in the embezzlement of Government money granted for the development of Gram Panchayat Barai Shahpur, Tehsil and Block Sikandra Rao, District Hathras.
(c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No.2- District Magistrate, District Hathras to decide the representation dated 16.12.2019 filed by the petitioner (Annexure No.2 to the Public Litigation Petition)."
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner referred to an order passed by District Magistrate dated August 24, 2017 vide which a Committee was constituted to inquire into alleged embezzlement of funds by the Gram Pradhan. The grievance raised is that no action has been taken.
3. The learned counsel for re
A litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice with tainted hands, is not entitled to any relief, interim or final. Suppression of material fact....
A litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands, by concealing material facts, is not entitled to any relief.
Point of Law : Making a false statement on oath is an offence punishable under Section 181 of the IPC while furnishing false information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to....
Point of Law : Appellants do no deserve any relief from this Court, as they are not only guilty of concealment of material facts from Court but had also indulged in forum shopping. They made efforts ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of approaching the court with clean hands and the consequences of suppression of material facts.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the non-mentioning of details with regard to previous petitions and the order disposing of the said petitions was not deliberate material conc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
