SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3037

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARINDAM SINHA, AVNISH SAXENA
Shiv Ratan Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru The Secy. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. review application for prior judgment. (Para 1)
2. arguments concerning recent judgment and possession. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis on review implications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. grounds for error in review dismissal. (Para 9)
5. review application dismissed. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

Arindam Sinha, J.

Ref: Civil Misc. Review Application No.6 of 2021.

1. The review application is for hearing and disposal. Review-applicant is the State. It seeks review of judgment dated 22nd January, 2015 of a Division Bench, none of the learned judges in which are at present available. Hence, we as the regular Bench are dealing with the review.

2. The application was earlier heard on 12th August, 2025 by a Bench, to which one of us was party (Arindam Sinha, J.). Preliminary objection was raised on behalf of writ petitioners, opposing the review, contending State had filed Special Leave to Appeal petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court, dismissed on order dated 4th December, 2019. It then filed for review on delay. It is an abuse of the process.

3. Mr. Srivastava, learned advocate and Standing Counsel appears on behalf of review-applicant (State).He relies on judgment dated 18 August, 2023

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top