SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3065

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, VINOD DIWAKAR, JJ. 
Ashok Kumar And Another - Petitioners
Versus
State Of UP And 3 Others - Respondents
Writ C No.20190 of 2024, WRIT - C No. - 32858 of 2024, WRIT - C No. - 16299 of 2023
Decided on : 12-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Abhijeet Mukherji, Rajesh Mishra
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Jagannath Maurya, Rajeshwar Tripathi, Shiv Prakash Gupta

Acquisition of land does not lapse if possession is taken and compensation is deposited; previous participation in proceedings bars new claims, and inordinate delays disqualify relief under Article 226.

Headnote:(A) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Sections 24(2) and 101 - Land acquisition proceedings - Petitioners sought return of land on grounds that acquisition had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation and possession not taken - Court held that possession was legally taken and compensation was deposited, thus acquisition did not lapse - Prior Supreme Court rulings confirmed validity of acquisition. (Paras 8.1, 8.3, 8.8)

(B) Constructive Res Judicata - Petitioners' claim barred since they previously participated in proceedings seeking higher compensation, acknowledging acquisition's validity - New grounds of challenge cannot be raised in subsequent litigation. (Paras 8.4, 8.6)

(C) Equitable Relief - Delays exceeding decades in raising claims result in disentitlement to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. (Paras 8.10, 8.12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought restoration of land acquired by State for development purposes, claiming acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, contending possession not taken and compensation unpaid - Petitioners previously filed for enhanced compensation acknowledging acquisition.

Findings of Court:
Acquisition remains valid as possession was taken and compensation deposited; petitioners' previous participation bars new claims; inordinate delay disqualifies equitable relief.

Issues: Whether acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) due to non-payment of compensation or failure to take possession; applicability of principles of res judicata to petitioners' claim.

Ratio Decidendi: Court confirmed that possession and compensation payment prevent lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2); previous claims barred by constructive res judicata; equitable relief denied due to delay.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.

1. Heard Shri Rajesh Mishra and Shri Abhijeet Mukherji, learned counsels for the petitioners, Shri Devesh Vikram and Shri Shuresh Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsels and Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri J.N. Maurya and Shri Shiv Prakash Gupta, learned counsels for the respondent - Meerut Development Authority.

2. Since all the aforesaid writ petitions involve a common legal issue concerning the applicability of Section 24(2) and Section 101 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petitions have been clubbed together, heard analogously, and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3.1 The Writ-C No. 20190 of 2023 has been filed, praying inter alia seeking issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to return and re-convey the petitioners’ land ad-measuring 0.2530 hectares, comprised in Khasra No. 708, situated at Village Abdullapur, Pargana and Tehsil Meerut, which was earlier sought to be acquired for the project of the Meerut Development Authority, [MDA], namely ‘Ganga Nagar Awasiya Vyasayik Yojana’, in terms of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the corresponding Section 101 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013[Act, 2013 ]; and further, to de-notify the said land as the acquisition proceedings initiated through notifications dated 01.02.1990 under Section 4(1) and 07.03.1990 under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894[Act, 1894] have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013; and in the alternative, to consider and decide the petitioners’ representation dated 30.01.2018 (Annexure No. 11 to this writ petition) regarding reversion and return of the land, after affording them due opportunity of hearing, within a stipulated period of time.

3.2 Similarly, WRIT - C No. - 32858 of 2024 has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to return and re-convey the petitioners’ land ad-measuring 0.8760 hectares, comprised in Khasra No. 770, situated at Village Abdullapur, Pargana and Tehsil Meerut, which was earlier sought to be acquired for the project of the Meerut Development Authority, namely ‘Ganga Nagar Awasiya Vyasayik Yojana’, in terms of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the corresponding Section 101 of the Act, 2013; and further, to de-notify the said land as the acquisition proceedings initiated through notifications dated 01.02.1990 under Section 4(1)/ 17(4) and 07.03.1990 under Section 6/ 17(1) of the Act, 1894 have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013; and in the alternative, to consider and decide the petitioners’ claim for reversion and return of the land, in the same manner as was done for other tenure holders through Government notifications dated 29.12.2016 and 10.03.2017, after affording due opportunity of hearing, within a stipulated period of time.

3.3 Similarly, WRIT-C No.16299 of 2023 has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to return and re-convey the petitioners’ land admeasuring 5.703 hectares, comprised in Khasra Nos. 740, 749, 750, 801, 781, 763, 501 and 772, situated at Village Abdullapur, Pargana and Tehsil Meerut, which was earlier sought to be acquired for the project of the Meerut Development Authority, namely ‘Ganga Nagar Awasiya Vyasayik Yojana’, in terms of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the corresponding Section 101 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013; and further, to de-notify the said land as the acquisition proceedings initiated through n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top