IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA
Har Swaroop – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.
1. Heard Sri Akhilesh along with Ripu Soodan Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant no. 2 and Sri Rahul Asthana, learned AGA for the State.
2. The appellants by way of this appeal have challenged their conviction under section 302 r/w 149 IPC and under section 148 IPC and sentence of imprisonment for life under section 302/149 IPC and sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment under section 148 IPC. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.
3. Vide order dated 11.3.2019, the appeal stood abated in respect of appellant no.1-Harswarup, appellant no. 3-Jawahar and appellant no. 4-Tulsi and vide order dated 27.2.2024, the appeal stood abated in respect of appellant no. 5-Bhagat Singh. Now the appeal is surviving only in respect of appellant no. 2-Suresh.
4. The prosecution case in brief is that the informant Kunwar Pal gave a written report to the SHO of police station Kosikala District Mathura stating therein that Harswarup, Charan Singh and Kishan Dutt are real brothers. The informant, Charan Singh and Kishan Dutt used to live together and Harswarup was living separately from them. It is further submitted that a dispute was existing re
The credibility of witness testimonies in criminal trials requires careful scrutiny, particularly when they are related to victims, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Related witness testimony can be credible in criminal proceedings, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the prosecution case if the core narrative remains intact.
Witness testimony, particularly that of injured victims, holds significant weight in criminal cases, affirming convictions despite claims of investigative defects or witness bias.
The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value and can support a conviction for murder when corroborated by medical evidence, establishing intent beyond reasonable doubt.
The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significa....
Eyewitness testimony from relatives is admissible and credible if consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of their relationship to the victim.
The court upheld the conviction of the surviving appellants based on reliable ocular evidence from injured witnesses, emphasizing the special status of such testimony in criminal cases.
The court affirmed that testimony from injured witnesses is highly credible, and minor inconsistencies do not undermine the prosecution's case if corroborated by medical evidence.
Eyewitness testimony from injured relatives is credible and can support a conviction, provided it is consistent and corroborated by medical evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the testimony of witnesses, even if related to the deceased, should not be automatically discarded, and minor discrepancies in the evidence sh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.