SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2982

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vivek Kumar Birla, Jitendra Kumar Sinha, JJ.
Bala Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2695 of 1986
Decided On : 13-08-2025

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant :- Kamlesh Kumar,Deena Nath
For Respondent:- A.G.A.

The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significance of injured witnesses' testimonies.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 302/149, and 304 Part-II/149 - Criminal appeal concerning convictions for murder and related offences - Convictions of the appellants are reconsidered from Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149, influenced by the medical opinion attributing death to septicaemia following ante mortem injuries - All sentences ordered to run concurrently with a fine of Rs. 25,000/- each imposed. (Paras 30-31)

(B) Evidence - Status of Injured Witnesses - The testimonies of injured witnesses stand on a higher pedestal, with the court emphasizing the significance of their presence during the incident and reliability of their accounts, even if not independent. (Paras 10-11)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution alleges that on 21.06.1982, the appellants attacked the informant's family using lethal weapons, leading to grievous injuries to the deceased Vidya Shankar, who died days later due to septicaemia arising from those injuries, after which charges were upgraded from Sections 302 to 304 I.P.C. (Paras 4-8)

Findings of Court:
The Court found the incident sufficiently corroborated by medical evidence indicating the nature and cause of injuries, ultimately reducing the severity of the charges against the appellants to Section 304 Part-II/149 I.P.C. (Paras 30-31)

Issues: The primary issues addressed were the nature of the injuries inflicted and whether the appellants acted with the requisite intention to cause death or were culpable for lesser charges. (Paras 10-11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that while injuries were severe, the causal link to the eventual death is attributable primarily to secondary complications such as septicaemia, thereby justifying a conviction under a lesser culpable section. (Paras 30)

Result: The appeal was partly allowed with modifications to the conviction while maintaining other sentences.

Table of Content
1. conviction under section 304 part-ii/149 confirmed (Para 3 , 8 , 9)
2. enmity led to violent altercation (Para 4 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. injured witnesses carry more credibility (Para 10 , 26)
4. intent and nature of injury determine murder charges (Para 29 , 30)
5. appeal partly allowed; sentences modified (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT

Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.

1. The appeal stood abated in respect of appellant Nos. 2 and 5 namely Nand Lal and Bhagirathi vide order dated 14.05.2025. The appeal survives in respect of appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 4 namely Bala Shankar, Rajmani and Mangaru.

2. Heard Sri Deena Nath, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri S.S.R. Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The appellants have challenged their conviction under Section 302 /149, 323/149 and 324/149 I.P.C.. Further appellant No.1 Bala Shankar has been convicted under Section 148 I.P.C. and rest of the appellants have been convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. The appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life under Section 302 /149 I.P.C. Appellant No.1 Bala Shankar has been sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 I.P.C., whereas rest of the appellants have been sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment for offence under Section 147 I.P.C. Appellant Bala Shankar has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 323 /149 I.P.C. and rest of the appellants have been sentenced six months rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 323 /149 I.P.C. Further all the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

4. Prosecution story in brief is that one Ram Pyare @ Babau Mishra gave a written report to the Police Station- Rampur, District- Jaunpur stating therein that on 21.06.1982 at about 02:00 P.M. Bala Shankar, Mangaru, Rajmani, Nand Lal and Bhagirathi armed with ‘ballam’ and ‘lathi’ (Bala Shankar was armed with ‘ballam’ and other were armed with ‘lathi’) came to his door and started abusing him. When he stopped them from abusing, Bhagirathi exhorted the other accused persons and on the said exhortation they attacked his brother Vidya Shankar and his mother Sohagin and their neighbour Adya Prasad Mishra by ‘lathi’ and ‘ballam’. When uproar was made, Murlidhar Mishra, Shambhunath Mishra, Anil Kumar Mishra reached there and intervened and saved them. It is further stated that Bala Shankar gave blows of ‘ballam’ to Vidya Shankar and Vidya Shankar had received many injuries. The informant has further stated that he reached the police station along with injured persons to lodge a report. On the basis of the above written report, the first information report was lodged under Sections 147 , 148, 323, 324 and 326 of the I.P.C. against Bala Shankar, Mangaru, Rajmani, Nand Lal and Bhagirathi. During medical treatment, Vidya Shankar died and case was converted into Section 304 I.P.C. After investigation the charge sheet was submitted under Sections 147 , 148, 323, 324, 326 and 304 of I.P.C. on 01.07.1982. The Magistrate took cognizance of the offence and committed the case to the court of sessions for trial. Trial stood transferred to the court of Special Judge/Additional Session Judge, Jaunpur. The then learned Addition Sessions Judge, Jaunpur framed charges under Section 147 , 302/149, 307/149 of the I.P.C. against appellants Mangaru, Rajmani, Nand Lal, Bhagirathi vide order dated 18.07.1983, whereas the appellant Bala Shankar has been charged under Sections 147 , 148, 302, 302/149, 307/149 I.P.C. vide order dated 18.07.1983.

5. The prosecution has examined Pyare Lal Mishra as PW-1. Adya Prasad as PW-2. Dr. Chandra Bhoosan Upaddhyay as PW-3. Dr. R.K. Singh as PW-4. Sri Vidya Dhar Tripathi (S.H.O.) as PW-5. Sri Purushottam Das Sharma as PW-6. Sri Jamwant Singh (Constable) as PW-7.

In documentary evidence, the prosecution has proved written report as Ext. Ka-1. Injury report of Adya Prasad as Ext. Ka-2. Injury report of Pyare Lal @ Babau as Ext. K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top