IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Vivek Kumar Birla, Jitendra Kumar Sinha
Bala Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.
1. The appeal stood abated in respect of appellant Nos. 2 and 5 namely Nand Lal and Bhagirathi vide order dated 14.05.2025. The appeal survives in respect of appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 4 namely Bala Shankar, Rajmani and Mangaru.
2. Heard Sri Deena Nath, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri S.S.R. Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The appellants have challenged their conviction under Section 302 /149, 323/149 and 324/149 I.P.C.. Further appellant No.1 Bala Shankar has been convicted under Section 148 I.P.C. and rest of the appellants have been convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. The appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life under Section 302 /149 I.P.C. Appellant No.1 Bala Shankar has been sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 I.P.C., whereas rest of the appellants have been sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment for offence under Section 147 I.P.C. Appellant Bala Shankar has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 323 /149 I.P.C. and rest of the appellants have been sentenced six months rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Sec
The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significa....
The credibility of witness testimonies in criminal trials requires careful scrutiny, particularly when they are related to victims, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Related witness testimony can be credible in criminal proceedings, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the prosecution case if the core narrative remains intact.
The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value and can support a conviction for murder when corroborated by medical evidence, establishing intent beyond reasonable doubt.
The court affirmed that testimony from injured witnesses is highly credible, and minor inconsistencies do not undermine the prosecution's case if corroborated by medical evidence.
The court determined that the accused's actions constituted culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as the prosecution failed to prove premeditation or undue advantage during a sudden fight.
Witness testimony, particularly that of injured victims, holds significant weight in criminal cases, affirming convictions despite claims of investigative defects or witness bias.
The court clarified that common intention under Section 34 IPC requires clear evidence of prearranged plans, leading to the first accused's conviction for culpable homicide under Section 304 while ac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.