IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI, JJ.
Gendan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. –Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1954 of 1993
Decided on : 25-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 45 , 47 , 48) |
(Per: Hon’ble Vivek Kumar Birla, J.)
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred assailing the judgement and order dated 25.10.1993 passed by Special/Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur in Sessions Trial No. 373 of 1986 convicting and sentencing the appellant under section 307 IPC to undergo imprisonment for life and under section 25 ARMS ACT to undergo sentence of three years rigorous imprisonment, directing all the sentences to run concurrently.
2. By the order dated 10.11.1993, the appellant was released on bail.
3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the complainant and the accused persons were residents of Village Kharkari, Police Station Katra, District Shahjahanpur. Accused Gendan Lal was the cousin (mausera bhai) of co-accused Karan Lal and he was the resident of Village Madhra, Police Station Bisalpur, District Pilibhit. Both sides had previous enmity due to which, one person from both sides had been murdered. Injured Ram Bharose was the uncle of complainant Raja Ram. One FIR was lodged for the murder of Balak Ram against accused sides and another FIR was lodged for the murder of Munna Lal (brother of accused Karan Lal) against the complainant side. Both the cases were pending before the Court of District & Sessions Judge-I. Ram Bharose, the injured and his brothers Brijpal and Mahendrapal and one Ram Saran were accused in the said case of murder of Munna Lal.
4. The prosecution version is that on 16.6.1986 at 12.30 p.m. in the Court of District & Sessions Judge-I, Shahjahanpur within the jurisdiction of Police Station Sadar Bazar, the trial of murder of Munna Lal (brother of accused Karan Lal) was going on in which, injured Ram Bharose (PW2), Mahendra Pal, Brij Pal and Ram Saran were standing in the witness box as accused persons. Complainant Raja Ram who was the prosecution witness in the said case was present in the Court for getting his evidence recorded against accused Karan Lal. Accused Karan Lal was the complainant in the case of murder of Munna Lal and his testimony was getting recorded in the Court along with one witness Dafedar. Accused Gendan Lal was also present in the said courtroom to whom accused Karan Lal indicated something by his fingers. On his indication, accused Gendan Lal took out a country-made pistol of 315 bore and fired at the injured Ram Bharose Lal (PW2) which hit him on his back. Accused Gendan Lal then tried to escape from the courtroom but he was caught by the complainant Raja Ram and Court Moharrir Ram Shankar along with his country- made pistol with one fired empty cartridge inside the pistol. Apart from this, five live cartridges were also recovered from the right pocket of accused Gendan Lal. He was taken to the police station by the complainant Raja Ram and Court Moharrir Ram Shankar. The written report was prepared on the way to the police station which is Ex. Ka-1. Accused Gendan Lal and injured Ram Bharose Lal were taken to the concerned police station. Thereafter, a chick report (Ex. Ka-5) was prepared by PW4 Constable Om Prakash Sharma on 16.6.1986 at 12.50 p.m. and he also made GD entry of the said incident which was registered as Case Crime No. 298 of 1986 and 299 of 1986 (Ex. Ka-6).
5. On the basis of written report of the complainant, a first information report was lodged against two accused persons namely, Gendan Lal and Karan Lal being S.T. No. 373/86 under Section 307 IPC . Accused Karan Lal was also charged under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC while accused Gendan Lal was also charged under Section 25 (A)(1) of the ARMS ACT in S.T. No. 374/86. Co-accused Karan Lal was later on exonerated by the trial court from the charges levelled against him.
6. In order to establish the prosecution case, five witnesses were examined namely, PW1 Raja Ram, PW2 Ram Bharose Lal, PW3 Dr. Amarlal and PW4 Constable Om Prakash Sharma, P.S. Mal Khana, Sadar, Shahjahanpur, PW5 S.I. Vijendra Prasad Singh Yada
Darya Singh vs. State of Punjab
Appabhai and another vs. State of Gujarat
State of A.P. vs. S. Rayappa and others
Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja Reddy v. State of AP
Satbir Singh and others vs. State of U.P.
Jayabalan vs. U.T. of Pondicherry
Shahaja @ Shahajan Ismail Mohd. vs. State of Maharashtra
Witness testimony, particularly that of injured victims, holds significant weight in criminal cases, affirming convictions despite claims of investigative defects or witness bias.
Related witness testimony can be credible in criminal proceedings, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the prosecution case if the core narrative remains intact.
The credibility of witness testimonies in criminal trials requires careful scrutiny, particularly when they are related to victims, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value and can support a conviction for murder when corroborated by medical evidence, establishing intent beyond reasonable doubt.
The court upheld the conviction of the surviving appellants based on reliable ocular evidence from injured witnesses, emphasizing the special status of such testimony in criminal cases.
The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significa....
The court affirmed that testimony from injured witnesses is highly credible, and minor inconsistencies do not undermine the prosecution's case if corroborated by medical evidence.
Eyewitness testimony from relatives is admissible and credible if consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of their relationship to the victim.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the testimony of witnesses, even if related to the deceased, should not be automatically discarded, and minor discrepancies in the evidence sh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.