IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Vivek Kumar Birla, Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, JJ.
Rakshpal – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Kumar Birla, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred assailing the judgement and order dated 15.11.1983 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Etah, in Sessions Trial No. 242 of 1983 convicting and sentencing the appellants under section 394 IPC read with section 397 IPC to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment and under section 460 IPC to undergo sentence of life imprisonment directing all the sentences to run concurrently.
2. By the order dated 18.11.1983 both the appellants were released on bail. As per the office report dated 10.5.2024 based on the report submitted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, the appellant no. 2-Jagdish, son of Jaerath Singh has died, therefore, appeal in respect of appellant no. 2 stood abated. The appeal now survives only on behalf of appellant no. 1-Rakshpal, son of Raghuvir Singh.
3. It is pertinent to mention here that co-accused Rameshwar and Menhdi had approached this Court by filing Criminal Appeal No. 2958 of 1983 (Rameshwar and another vs. State of UP). During pendency of appeal appellant no.2 Menhdi therein died, therefore, appeal on his behalf stood abated. In respect of the appellant no.1- Rameshwar therein the appe
Darya Singh vs. State of Punjab
Appabhai and another vs. State of Gujarat
State of A.P. vs. S. Rayappa and others
Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja Reddy v. State of AP
Satbir Singh and others vs. State of U.P.
Jayabalan vs. U.T. of Pondicherry
Related witness testimony can be credible in criminal proceedings, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the prosecution case if the core narrative remains intact.
The credibility of witness testimonies in criminal trials requires careful scrutiny, particularly when they are related to victims, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The testimony of injured witnesses holds significant evidentiary value and can support a conviction for murder when corroborated by medical evidence, establishing intent beyond reasonable doubt.
Witness testimony, particularly that of injured victims, holds significant weight in criminal cases, affirming convictions despite claims of investigative defects or witness bias.
The court affirmed that testimony from injured witnesses is highly credible, and minor inconsistencies do not undermine the prosecution's case if corroborated by medical evidence.
Eyewitness testimony from relatives is admissible and credible if consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of their relationship to the victim.
The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significa....
The court upheld the conviction of the surviving appellants based on reliable ocular evidence from injured witnesses, emphasizing the special status of such testimony in criminal cases.
Eyewitness testimony from injured relatives is credible and can support a conviction, provided it is consistent and corroborated by medical evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.