IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
PANKAJ BHATIA
Hari Shankar Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
Addl. District Judge E.C. Act Court No. 4, Lko. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to execution proceedings by landlord. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. maintainability of objections under order 21. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. requirements for filing application under order 21 rule 97 cpc. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. order quashing previous orders and directing execution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 20.02.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge, E.C. Act Court no.4 Lucknow in Misc. Case No.257 of 2023 ( Jai Prakash Singh Vs. Hari Shankar Kushwaha ) whereby directions were issued for framing the issues under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC. The petitioner is also sought the quashing of entire proceedings of Misc. Case No.257 of 2023 ( Jai Prakash Singh Vs. Hari Shankar Kushwaha ) under Order 21 Rule 97, 98 and 101 CPC pending before the Additional District Judge, EC Act, Court no.4. A further prayer has been sought seeking direction for concluding the Execution Case No.23 of 2021 ( Hari Shankar Kushwaha vs. Jai Prakash Singh ).
2. The facts, in brief, are that the landlord, the petitioner herein, filed a SCC Suit for arrears of rent, eviction and damages against the tenant Jai
Brahmadeo Choudhary vs. Rishikesh Prasad Jaiswal and another
Shreenath and another vs. Rajesh and others
Sameer Singh and another vs. Abdul Rab and others
Silverline Forum Pvt. Ltd. vs. Rajiv Trust and another
NSS Narayan Sarma and others vs. Goldstone Exports (P) Ltd. and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.