SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2428

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Inam – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: G.A.,Mohd. Aslam

JUDGMENT :

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

1. This criminal revision has been filed against the judgement and order dated 3.7.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Saharanpur whereby second bail application moved moved in default clause under section 167(2)(a)(i) Cr.P.C. has been dismissed in Case Crime no. 131 of 2023, under section 302 IPC and section 3/25/27 of ARMS ACT , P.S. Nanauta, District Saharanpur.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and learned AGA for the State.

3. According to the prosecution version, FIR of the incident was lodged by the informant Smt. Hamida on 3.8.2023 at 5:09 AM stating therein that on 2.8.2023 at around 11:00 PM, her co-villager Inam son of Yameen came to her house and called her son Naushad for doing some conversation and took her son outside the village in the field of Jafari where he assaulted her son by butt of country made pistol and thereafter he opened fire due to which her son suffered injury on face and hand by the pallets of cartridge, after hearing noise of fire, informant and her another son Shoyeb reached at the spot then the accused Inam fled away from the place. The FIR was lodged under s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top