Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Afaq – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The above criminal appeals have been heard together as appellants Afaq and Rais @ Munna who were tried together filed criminal appeals separately against the same judgement.
2. Upon an incident having taken place on 20th June, 1984 at around 7:30 a.m., wherein one Shabbir Ahmad Khan had died, his brother Saleem Khan got lodged a first information report at 8:30 a.m. As per the first information report, the brother of the first informant while was, on 20 June, 1984, at 7:30 a.m. after having answered the call of nature, going back to his home, Afaq s/o Jamaluddin Khan and Rais @ Munna s/o Shakir Khan near the Gosai Talab accosted the deceased. Afaq was carrying a razor (ustara) while Rais was empty handed as was stated in the first information report and when Rais and Afaq met Shabbir, they entered into a verbal altercation and thereafter there was a physical fight as well. Thereafter, Rais exhorted Afaq to kill the deceased and subsequently Afaq with the help of Rais had assaulted Shabbir with the razor with an intention to kill.
3. It has been stated in the first information report that the incident was witnessed by Yakoob Khan, Nasiruddin Khan, Ali Ahmad @ Gajju Khan,
The court emphasized that witness reliability is critical in criminal cases, and testimonies lacking credibility cannot warrant a conviction.
The testimony of chance witnesses must be scrutinized rigorously, and without credible corroborating evidence, convictions cannot be sustained.
The burden of proof rests on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and contradictions in eyewitness testimonies may result in acquittal.
Point of Law : While appreciating the evidence of a witness, minor discrepancies on trivial matters, which do not affect the core of the prosecution case, may not prompt the court to reject the evide....
Conviction for mass murder under 302/149 IPC set aside due to unreliable, contradictory ocular evidence from related witnesses; doubtful night identification, improbable presence/story; benefit of do....
Witness reliability is crucial in criminal cases; if a witness is deemed unreliable, their testimony cannot support a conviction without corroboration.
Direct eyewitness testimony can establish guilt in murder cases, supported by physical evidence, where minor discrepancies do not diminish credibility.
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on credible evidence, including witness testimony and medical findings, even absent direct physical evidence like weapon recovery.
(1) Evidence cannot be disbelieved merely on the ground that witnesses are related to each other or to deceased.(2) Plea of alibi has to be weighed against positive evidence led by prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
