HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, VIVEK SARAN
Prakash Medical Stores – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to the order on delay in appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. application of limitation act principles. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 3. relation of applications and limitation periods. (Para 6 , 30) |
| 4. arguments on appeal and limitation. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. writ petition is allowed, setting aside previous order. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed to assail the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal)-V, State Tax, Kanpur (respondent No.4) whereby the first appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 107 of the UP GST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as the Act), against the ex-parte adjudication order dated 23.04.2024 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-27, Lakhanpur Kanpur-respondent No.3, under Section 73 of the Act for the Financial Year 2018-19, (creating demand of Tax/Cess Rs.7,81,838.98/- together with interest Rs.7,86,164/- and penalty Rs.78,184/-) has been dismissed as time barred. The remaining prayers (in the petitio
Atlantis Intelligence Ltd. vs. Union of India and others
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise vs. Hongo India Pvt. Ltd.
Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited
Bhudan Singh and another vs. Nabi Bux and another
J. Kumaradasan Nair vs. Iric Sohan
The principles of Section 14 of the Limitation Act allow for exclusion of time spent on bona fide applications, thereby justifying the filing of the appeal within the limitation period despite prior ....
The appellate authority under the APGST Act cannot condone delays beyond the one-month limit specified in Section 107(4), excluding broader provisions of the Limitation Act.
Assessment – Condonation of Delay in filing Appeal - Appellate authority is not empowered to condone the delay beyond the aggregate period of limitation - statutory appeal was barred by limitation, t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the CGST Act prevail over the provisions of the Limitation Act, and there is no power to entertain an appeal beyond the pres....
An appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) is barred by time if not filed within the statutory period specified in the Finance Act, 1994, and requires sufficient cause for delay to be justified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.